Suggestion made purely as a joke: Get Tarun Khaitan back to India and get him to be the NUJS VC. He supposedly cares so much about legal scholarship in India, this will be his chance to do something about that on a full-time basis + curing the problems of a T1 uni sliding towards T2!

It was obvious that they would not form the search committee during Chandrachud’s time but would wait for Gavai to take over. Being a Harvard alum and a backer of Sudhir and Jindal’s Rajkumar, Chandrachud may have given a push to an NLU/DU alum with a foreign degree — which is exactly the kind of VC the government does not want.

The new search committee for NUJS VC selection has been decided. The SJA and students should now push to get a new VC who is an established NLU alum/prof and a well-regarded academic. Otherwise the government is sure to fill the post with its own incompetent acolyte like the current one and ring the final death knell for the place. It is unlikely that the students will do anything though, they are mostly selfish and lack any spine or foresight. They will get a bad guy and then keep crying about why that person is not looking after their interest over the next five years.

Bahajaja....NLU and their glorified little bubble.

NLU politics is like little kids with egos playing I'm better than you pity party. Real University politics dekhna hai toh go to DU, JNU or BHU. That's what real politics is. They have national parties investing money in their elections, here even state political branches don't invest money or time in NLU politics.

Also, like other things, most political ideologies in NLUs are just "trends". They have no loyalty. They term themselves liberal and LW and then beg for corporate placements and become extremely RWs where they lick their corporate overlords boots.

First off. Tier system is not an official system. It's a made up mumbo-jumbo to get aspirants excited. If you look at the consortium list, the chronology is always "year of establishment" wise. This makes sense since the newest NLU would be lacking in even basic facilities like their own campus.

Second, the tier system is absolutely not based on faculty. All NLUs have great professors, mid and really bad professors; including tier 1s. If we were basing tiers on star power than Jindal has the most legends, yet we know how it's not comparable to a tier 1.

Third, city does not matter, otherwise Mumbai would have immediately shot up in the rankings.

Fourth, NLUs were established to provide, surprise~surprise, better litigators and judges. They were supposed to be the beacon of the best legal education. The founder of this concept was more a fan of litigation and not corporate slavery. However this whole concept was overtaken by corporate stooges, and became a full on D measuring contest of placements.

Lastly, law is a "professional" degree. Just like you don't ask a doctor about "placements", that used to be the same with lawyers. However, this placement mentality of b.tech and MBA jobs seeped into law.

This is where the harsh reality steps in, people enter NLUs thinking they would earn more or the same as a btech grad, which is not the case and never will be. So they get disappointed. The only place this may happen is if you litigate, where earning crores is easy. However, NLU kids spend so much, that they don't want to spend the next 5 more years in court earning peanuts, so they hardly join litigation.

TL;dr - Corporate/Law firm placements define tiers.

Something I would like to add is that, perceptions of merit change. This change is quite perceptible when you look at the rankings every 5 or 6 years, as in that time changes occur. However as CLAT becomes ever more popular, I do think we'll see perceptions being soldified slowly. NUJS, HNLU, and MNLU Nagpur are a few unis who've had changes in their fortunes that are well known. In fact, there was a time, when HNLU was considered better than GNLU. That has long passed since, and we all know what the situation is now.

Top heavy. Too many PAs and enough SAs, which is why promotions are relatively difficult in Corp 7 at any level and bonuses are lesser on average. That said, this also means that as an associate you get less work, and the fresher bonus was highest amongst the clusters this year, because they want to acquire and retain fresh talent. They also don't typically give PPOs and hire almost exclusively from Day Zeros or laterally.

Apart from that, work life balance is great at junior levels because again, too many mid level do the work amongst themselves. No complaints as such, unless you're at a stage where promotion matters.

The capital markets law firm teams in India are notorious for their grueling work schedules and poor work-life balance, often driven by the high-pressure nature of transactions, tight deadlines, and client demands. Associates in these teams frequently face long hours, with workdays stretching well beyond midnight, especially during peak deal periods such as IPO seasons or major mergers and acquisitions. The unpredictable nature of capital markets transactions means that lawyers must be on call at all times, leading to canceled personal plans, missed family events, and chronic stress. The culture of overwork is deeply ingrained, with junior associates often bearing the brunt of last-minute drafting, due diligence, and client calls, leaving little room for personal time or relaxation. The lack of boundaries between work and personal life is exacerbated by the expectation of immediate responsiveness, even during weekends or holidays, creating a relentless cycle of burnout and exhaustion.

Moreover, the competitive environment within these firms further exacerbates the work-life imbalance, as lawyers feel compelled to outperform peers to secure promotions or retain their positions. The high stakes of capital markets transactions, where errors can have significant financial and reputational consequences, add to the pressure, leaving little room for flexibility or downtime. Firms often prioritize client demands over employee well-being, resulting in a culture where taking time off is frowned upon or seen as a lack of commitment. The physical and mental toll of such an environment is evident, with many lawyers experiencing health issues, anxiety, and attrition due to the unsustainable workload. Despite occasional lip service to work-life balance initiatives, the reality remains unchanged, as the structural demands of capital markets work in India continue to overshadow any meaningful efforts to improve quality of life for legal professionals in this space.

RTI for the inquiry report concerning 2017 faculty recruitment. Serious allegations were made against recruitment made in previous years but no inquiries were initiated. But SJA action during PIBout triggered the inquiry into 2017 recruitment. But like all other inquiries initiated by the EC in 2018 during PIBout, this inquiry also got derailed by the powers that be

NUJS? Although SJA expose during PIBexit put a stop to all distance edu courses, the inquiry was quietly killed off. So the perps in the faculty ranks continue to strut. However, similar courses were also run at GNLU (during BimPa days); RGNUL (under PJ watch) and NLUJ

Will BCI actually show spine and do a thorough inquiry starting with NLUs?

BCI powers are limited to regulate LLB degree which is needed for enrolment as an Advocate under the Advocates Act. LLM and PhD programs have always been regulated by UGC for last 60 years. BCI is only trying to usurp the powers of UGC and monopolise legal education at Masters and PhD level as well. Someone must sue them in court to going beyond their jurisdiction.

I'm graduating this year from a not-so-well-known private law college. Most of my internships so far have been at the district court level, and I haven't interned at any corporate law firms.

Lately, I've been thinking more seriously about trying to get into the corporate side, especially after seeing discussions around how much people at top firms make. I know most of those folks come from top NLUs and have solid internship experience to back them up.

I'm aware that I don’t really have the kind of profile these firms usually look for, i have no corporate internships, no standout college brand, and no relevant skills.

So my question is — is there any realistic way for someone like me to make a shift toward corporate law? And if I don’t have those internships, what can I do now to learn the relevant skills to coverup what I lack.

I dont care enough about american politics to care. But just as a cultural thing its bizarre to me how people everywhere cannot spot actors when they see them. Hes an actor. He wanted fame. He tried being a rapper and failed. And this is the new grift. But then again look at our country and all the actors we've elected. Stupid stupid stupid.

Weeknd

KanyeKendrick

Drizzy

Beyonce

Rihanna

Billie Eilish

Olivia Rodrigo

Sabrina Carpenter

Gracie Abrams

Sia

Sza

Ed Sheeran

21 pilots

Adele

Nirvana

Pink Floyd

Beatles

Tupac

Biggie

Guns N Roses

Ac/DC

Led Zeppelin

Lil Wayne

Taylor Swift

Lana Del Ray

Gwen Stefani

Madonna

Queen

Elton John

Eminem

Michael Jackson

Lil Nas X

Britney Spears

Ariana Grande

Nicki Minaj

Lady Gaga

Bruno Mars

Coldplay

Shakira

Artic Monkeys

Daft Punk

Bob Dylan

Radiohead

Justin Timberlake

Pharell

Snoop Dogg

Katy Perry

Nelly Furtado

Timbaland

### The Decline of NLS-

### 1. Faculty Alone Cannot Sustain a Law School’s Reputation
While NLS still retains some of its esteemed faculty, that is practically all it has left. A strong faculty, though valuable, plays only a marginal role in legal education. Law school is inherently self-driven, reading judgments, analyzing case laws, and developing advocacy skills depend far more on individual effort than on classroom teaching. NALSAR’s continued success, despite losing several top professors to NLS, proves this point. It thrives because it maintains the essential ecosystem a law school needs: good academics, strong peer learning, and institutional support for research, moot courts, and placements.

2. The Systemic Collapse of NLS’s Institutional Strengths
A great law school is more than just its teachers, it requires infrastructure, manageable batch sizes, robust placement networks, and a culture of excellence. NLS, however, has been eroded by administrative neglect and unchecked expansion. The batch sizes have become unsustainable, making it impossible to place even 75% of graduates in meaningful legal careers. Unlike engineering or business, the legal profession does not have an ever-expanding job market; elite corporate firms, in house roles, litigation chambers, and public policy roles are limited. Flooding the market with graduates only devalues the degree and leaves students stranded.

3. The NALSAR Comparison: Why Holistic Development Matters
NALSAR, despite faculty attrition, has managed to uphold its reputation because it focuses on what truly shapes legal professionals:

- Controlled intake, ensuring each student gets adequate opportunities.
- Strong alumni networks that facilitate mentorship and placements.
- Institutional support for advocacy, such as moot courts, internships, and research projects.
- A culture of academic rigour, where peer learning compensates for weaker faculty in some areas.

NLS, meanwhile, has traded long-term stability for short-term revenue, diluting its brand and failing its students. Without urgent reforms, smaller batches, better career support, and restored academic priorities, its decline will only accelerate.

Similarly places like GNLU also needs to learn and follow the same, and any other Law school looking to expand batch sizes, learn from NALSAR, even with its flaws, it remains the best atm!

hi, i will be beginning with my third year this august, i am intersted in competition law(have won a prestigious anti trust moot) and data privacy laws. Also, i belong to a tier 3 NLU. What kind of internships or other things(or skills) should i do to be at par with tier 1 NLU kids? I have decent publications, internships and won research based competitions as well. But sometimes the future just makes me anxious because of my college which gives minimal support to students. Also, how do students form connections with these firm peeps when the alumni base is not that wide?

Any help or direction would be appreciated. (also, i am well aware of the biases around T3 so not repeating them in the comments would be highly appreciated).

Thanks.

Hi, they ask you questions from your CV only, so you just need to be well prepared regarding the points you have mentioned in your cv. And no didnt recieve any assignments, just interview at their office with 2 partners and 1 HR but after that no further feedback or even a rejection mail

Is it true that the chance of converting a callback internship into a PPO, is based on hiring cycles in Tier-1 law firms? Does the Indian legal market have a similar hiring cycle or does it differs from firm to firm? Which months in a year is ideal for doing a callback, keeping in mind a PPO?

Kind people (especially associates) at LI, please help with this query

This is a friendly summons to all you litigating legends, arbitration aficionados, and dispute divas: If you come across Tier 1 Disputes job openings, kindly post them in this thread.

After all, we’re not just here to roast the system—we're here to help each other brief better, bill smarter, and maybe… land that next dream gig (without selling our souls to the devil in pinstripes. This community isn’t just a space to spill hot chai on law firm partners (though we do love a little masala). It can also be your soft corner for sharing the real juice—casual openings, whisper vacancies, and those oh-so-rare spots at top disputes teams that don’t hit LinkedIn till it’s too late.

So here’s a proposal, without prejudice but full of potential:

The next time you see a job post or hear a whisper from a recruiter, don’t just forward it to your BFF who already works at CAM. Slide it into this chat. Let someone else shoot their shot. Let’s be each other’s best closing argument.

Because legal karma is real, sweetheart. Today you share, tomorrow you rise.