We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
for the new batch being admitted into NLSIU in 2025 do first year students have the option to opt out of hostel accommodation and stay in their own accommodation?
Most top NLU kids are centrist liberals who generally don't yap a lot about politics unless something significant comes up. Then there's a small but very vocal left-wing group which never fails to make a lot of noise. Similarly, right-wing Sanghi groups exist, although they tend to tone down their controversial opinions. Libertarians are a rarity - it is a foreign ideology in Indian context, thus many are completely unaware of what it is.
However, you will definitely find a few in every single batch. It was fun occasionally wearing a Gadsden flag t-shirt on campus, as on multiple occasions I was asked about it by those who actually know what the symbol stands for.
This is my hypothesis. Would welcome everyoneβs views.
I recently came across my partners home in koramangala and boy was that a thing fucking beauty. I am curious to know if most partners in Bangalore reside in such lavish accommodations?
A. Not having to pay Mumbai rents
B. Decent returns on investments
C. Conservative lifestyle inflation
1cr net worth is easily doable within 5 years at T1
Obviously, this is assuming the person keeps their lifestyle in check for the first 4-5 years i.e., avoids buying a fancy car (> 10L), stays in a decent place (rent < 20-25k) and avoids foreign vacations.
This is also assuming that the person does not have significant financial liabilities (> 20k a month) i.e., towards education loan, family, health, etc.
solely on that basis, nujs has been able to place double the number of aspirants per year for the last ten years than nluj, so my choice is cleear. it is difficult to completely wipe that kind of track record in 5 years
if you want to go for ifra etc. nluj wins (compare the money that they have spent)
The next step will have to be twofold:
1. Approach the courts against misgovernance. The SC rather than the Cal HC, which is useless. Also, file an intervention petition in the NLSIU national status case pending before the SC, since it affects NUJS too.
2. Simultaneously, go on a protest and immediately seek the resignation of NKC and the appointment of a new VC. His tenure is over and his extension is illegal.
That aside, the key problem is that the TMC government has ruined NUJS over the past 15 years (as they have ruined other institutions in the state). I donβt blame the students and disagree with the above comments. If you have bad leadership, students anywhere will become lazy and woke, even at NLSIU. The students inherently are bright. They just lack guidance.
Jyoti Basu was a London-educated barrister and Buddhadev Bhattacharya was an intellectual and very honest man. They gave full autonomy to Madhava Menon, BS Chimni and MP Singh, who recruited good professors and invited the countryβs top luminaries to the NUJS governing body. In contrast, Mamata Banerjee and her ministers are as corrupt as they uncouth and uneducated, and you can see this reflected in the quality of leadership and governing body invitees at NUJS today.
As for the future, I donβt see the TMC losing in the 2026 elections. They start with a default 35% head start in vote count, because the Muslim vote bank has shifted en masse from the Left-Congress to the TMC.
Thus, choose NLUJ.
If you want an assessment officially or a callback at t1 which is basically the same, you have to first intern there and get a second internship.
All I have come to know its a case study kind of subjective test for 3 hours.
Get into colleges like Harvard, Oxford or Cambridge. Scholarship is added bonus. (How to get in? Do your own bit of research).
During your tenure do internships. Traineeships/apprenticeship are great way to gain some experience as in USA in order to sit for the bar, you need to have some experience in practicing their laws.
This is only the process. How you make the best of your opportunities is on you.
Best of luck!
Other than that, Germany, Switzerland may also not be all that bad.
1. She has to do her own cooking, cleaning, dishwashing and laundry for herself.
2. She has to clean her backsides with toilet paper - genuinely, my sympathies for that, BTW, it is disgusting and hard to adjust to on a visseral level.
3. She has to work her butts off and continually prove herself, because other countries' academic setups have accountability systems with consequences, unlike our own. Also, there are caveats to the thinking that people won't have to struggle with as much admin as in India. You do have to struggle with silly uni admin, and, if you are living in the UK, lots more besides (UK folks will know what I mean).
4. She has to deal with the prospects of changing visa policies and immigration rules, because these are constantly kept under review by the host country's government. She went in hot, thinking there was no need to be adaptable and ever think about the fact that the host country, even if it was welcoming initially, may not remain welcoming. Essentially, she felt she'd get red carpet treatment and never feel the need to argue for why she is not indispensable.
5. Again, she came in hot, not anticipating some of the natural factors abroad. For example, cold. That does make your life hard.
6. She is trying to speak to the genuine reality that job markets - even overseas - are tough now. As an example, constant hawkishness by the UK government over immigration in recent times has meant declining international student enrolment. The consequence that this has had for people in the UK - including pre-existing international students and university graduates (recent postdocs, for example) - is that universities are making layoffs to compensate for the loss in international student tuition fees and yet balance the books.
7. All the above has to be managed with a high cost of living, the price for all the good things the west gives you.
Why is the tone of my response a mixture of contemptuousness and politeness? Contempt because the way this has been worded is extraordinarily irresponsible. This seems like a discouragement to look abroad for opportunities, when a more thoughtful way of writing that would have been that your expectations need to be realistic, especially remember that there are always tradeoffs in life. Polite because life abroad can be hard, and there's no use denying that - so it's a good point, as far as it goes, but not very far. It is the non-elaboration that angers me most, because it seems to have been designed to discourage.
I made the life-changing decision to go abroad, with the hope that I might be able to live and settle abroad in the long-term. Did I have an expectation that it has to work out? Not necessarily, because that ain't how life works. But my experience of studying, working and living abroad has, overall, been a great one. Even if it doesn't result in long-term living there, that's okay. I would obviously be sad, but I wouldn't change a thing about it.
Really confused on how to start building up on my internships looking at how bad the hiring scenes are currently.
I think your question is can someone without clientele become a partner. Yes, absolutely they can.
Logic: A PA3 could get offer for partnership from T2 / T1 law firms. His EP would not want him to leave so he would offer partnership.
Some firms also have targets - bill enough and become a partner. Lots of partners IK do not gave connections / contacts/ clientele.
Having said that, you should also look out for building connections & networking - not from requirement standpoint but growth.
So, keep faith in what you know and you do; and dont loose your efforts. The things will fall in their place and destiny will take you where you belong.
I graduated from HNLU ages ago, and trust me those were the good ages :) So would really like to know what has changed.
Can a member/partner of a TMT team ever be as significant or as big of fee earner as a partner in say GC/M&A?
Also, does beginning a career in and focusing on TMT limit ones options to move to any other roles in the future, could this be dangerous given that TMT generally seems to be handled by a smaller number of people?
I'm practicing in the district court, and I thought about doing a part time PhD to shift into academia later on. However, I do not have the time or energy to crack the top law schools, it's competitive as F.
So I planned on doing one from a nearby private university. How much detrimental would that be ?
So for those who are not tier 1 material... Yet still want a decent academic experience and a chance to grow, what would your rankings be for the tier 2 NLUs ??