It does, over time, but you have to take some active steps (including, maybe, getting professional advice, depending on how bad the situation is).

The biggest thing is identifying the source of debt. Second thing is to ensure all your money is not going to repayment. Keep some aside for investment/savings. If you can manage both over time, you will be in a better place. Been there and once you cross the hill that anxiety really drops.

Faculty is not as important as the quality of your fellow students in class. They are the ones that will drive the competition and compel you to either improve or languish. On that basis, NLSIU, NALSAR, NLUD, NUJS can be reasonably placed over DU. I leave the place of the remaining NLUs in this comparison to other commentators.

His father was a lawyer, so he is technically NOT a first-gen lawyer, however, his father wasn't a big-shot like Harish Salve's father, who was the Union Minister of Power. Then, how did someone like Arun Jaitley build the name and fame he had as an excellent civil/corporate/white-collar attorney) attorney and a brilliant politician.

Right now, even his friends are just playing sympathy card and trying to show dominance while they don’t know that people are just not saying anything because they think they are the victims. The other day, I saw they came very close to get beatings when they cursed some fifth year.

Last they were in news for that abusive drunk abusive Principal Associate in Noida society hitting and abusing poor security guards? Surely DSK is better firm than volunteering for such cheap publicity- this is not Big Boss or some release of film that such an embarrassing publicity was warranted. No logic justifies this as it seems it was not well throught through with next steps and counter strategy. Removing videos make them naive, instead they should have fought it through which may have resulted in changes to an archaic law on advertisement.

Your suggestion reminded me of a comment I previously contributed to another discussion on the same theme of the rule of law. Sharing it here in interest of relevance. << https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/423362-t#comment-423927 >>.

It is a sensible suggestion but it does not fit in with how public administrators understand the function of law in the polity. Even in the US, with a far longer tradition of the rule of law, one can see how raw power can subvert and degrade any principle that seeks to establish neutrality in decision-making. In India, does the majority actually support the rule of law? Do they actually accept the premise that individual civil rights are sacrosanct and cannot be made subservient to communal identity? These are political questions and it is in answering them that we establish the contours of how we relate with the practice of the rule of law in Indian context. It is that context which then determines recruitment and training policies. The problem of Indian polity is not that it is insufficiently committed to the rule of law but that it is already committed to another understanding of the purpose of law. In that understanding, civil liberties are desirable but not essential. What is essential is public order, prevention of riots, and balance of power between communal identities. Until this understanding persists, any attempt to reform will either under-perform on its aims or end up being subverted. Just take the entire discourse on Lokpal (and in a similar vein, on collegium) and how badly we struggled to create an accountability institution because we could not figure out who possesses the necessary integrity to be given that power in the first place. Why? Because that integrity itself is not aligned with how law is practiced in our polity. And then we ended up with the worst of both worlds, neither an institution that works nor one that is trusted to have any integrity.

No one has remotely suggested that. Or are you referring to fake claim of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 taking away the rights of an Indian citizen on the basis of their religion. The Act doesn't even talk about Indian citizens.

Stop being such a snowflake. Just because someone criticises someone else doesn't mean they want to annihilate their rights. It is a debate. Strong language and stronger arguments will be a part of it.

Here is the thing. Europeans do learn Latin. As do Americans. Language is an instrument of communication across past, present, and future. Understanding our past requires us to learn classical languages in a rigorous, methodical manner. It enables us to be in communion with our forefathers and how they thought over the same issues that we are now working with. So even when a particular language cannot serve as a medium of communication in the present tense, it is still a valid form of communication through which we are participating in a discourse of understanding and revelation with our cultural past.

It is all about providing an introduction of who you are as a professional that LinkedIn can best be of service. No harm in making a profile and updating it regularly with your academic and professional achievements. At the same time, no need to obsess over it and spending a disproportionate amount of time on it.

There is no path of least resistance here. It is a journey of our adulthood to recognise the distance between the ideal and its practice in every domain/profession. It is through ambition, discipline, and humility that we get started with what we have come to do here, even when surrounded by indifference and corruption. You do your best, you meet a few good souls who complement your ethical and professional sensibilities, and together you build a legacy of achievement and excellence, no matter how modest your circumstances may be. And then you leave this grand experiment called human life, perhaps a little doubtful if you have really improved the world from as it was before your arrival. But because you lived the good life, honoured the right virtues, encouraged the gentle over the cruel, and upheld your side of the ethical bargain, you leave with no regrets. You may doubt whether the world is a better place but you will never doubt the worth of your own deeds. Because that is the confidence that comes from having lived a life of integrity and excellence.

I wish you the best in your journey, comrade.

It is rumoured that most of the seniors of the 2024 designation by SC (around 100 designations were made) were undeserving who couldn't even get briefs. There's a report by the wire also where DYC was accused to favouring his own people in the committee for designation of SAs.

Can I become a management consultant?([ 8/8/9) Profile]. I currently work at a T1 lala firm. The work is mundane and I know for a fact that this won't be sustainable in the long term. I know that many management consultancy firms require a BTech. Is there a way around it? If so enlighten me

The amount Saraf bashing that happens on LI - but the reality is quite different and by the looks of someone in the profession the place is actually stable - yes they have MS but he has so far not burnt it down contrary to the flames that get fanned regularly here. And by the looks of it Saraf ppl don’t mind being the favourite whipping boys on LI. They seem to have kuch toh log kehenge on loop.

Academia is often a lottery. If it works out, it works out. But be prepared for heartbreaks, rejections and disappointments. From wierd PhD rejections to extremely idiotic questions in job interviews to not being shortlisted for job interviews - you might see it all.

Sometimes, life feels like a chore- same as a law firm, like you are Sisyphus moving the stone to the top of the hill and when you finally do it, you've to do it again. A Partner may get more satisfaction on closing a merger than a teacher may get after finishing the semester / trimester.