I came across this thread three years later and I think I can figure out the team OP works (or worked in) because I'm exactly in such a team and every word OP mentioned can be directly applied on my case as well.

OP, hope your life has gotten better. If you did switch to something else, do let us know. Unsure about what opportunities I have after working in this particular niche area.

More often than not, typos are merely a consequence of typing quickly and frequently on a small screen. It is not a sign of illiteracy that some make it out to be. The author of the main comment has argued with facts and logic and that is far more relevant here than an odd awkward turn in a sentence.

hello everyone, and thank you in advance for answering

I am 28 years old. I live in Delhi, and I have been practising hard-core litigation for five years now. While I am reasonably satisfied with the kind of work that I have had the opportunity to do, I am a little frustrated by the financial aspect of a very upper limit. Sort of situation being reached in terms of any stipend I can make from a law chamber. I am considering a switch to a tier 1/2 law firm in Delhi specifically within the litigation/white collar crime scheme of things.

Can someone please give me an explanation of how this transition will be taking into account that I have worked in some of the best offices in the city over the last five years, but not longer than for about a year in each. I have learnt trial court High Court and Supreme Court work as well as a brief stint with a commercial law firm dealing in a lot more advisory and Corp kind of work. Also, which top 3 firms and what teams (if you’re aware) should I be seeking a reference into? if someone could give some suggestions?

Abstract:

This dissertation is an article compilation thesis that explores the possibility of producing humanistic social science in general, using the case of conducting research on jihadist group members within the 'War on Terror' context. Empirically, the study employs first-hand interviews of jihadist group members in France. It finds that employing queer theory, crip theory, and affect theory to analyze both participants' lived reality and the way one ought to produce knowledge provides novel insights. Challenging reductionist narratives that frame jihadist group members as deviant or monstrous, it argues for nuanced interpretations that account for their complex lived experiences. The dissertation proposes to focus on intimacy-romantic relationships, friendships, and familial bonds— as the locus of projection and assignation of monstrosity as well as a space of agency and autonomy for the subjects of study. The theoretical framework presented therein advocates for de-exceptionalizing these actors and introduces critical (re)contextualization as a tool for ethical scholarship. This perspective situates jihadist group members as individuals inscribed in modernity whose aspirations and struggles often mirror broader and banal societal dynamics. Considering the question of how to concretely produce knowledge in this field, the thesis critiques the emotional and affectual regime prevalent in terrorism studies, advocating for data-gathering methods that consider both the researcher's and subject's inherent human vulnerability and agency. The dissertation concludes by urging scholars to critically examine how the War on Terror perpetuates colonial and imperial legacies in the way one produces knowledge, advocating for a justice-oriented - and tangible —humanistic sociological practice, one which ought to resist dehumanizing narratives. The dissertation proposes playfulness and metaphor as epistemological interventions, provoking readers to embark on a journey of exploring surprising parallels, revealing the narrow parameters confining pre-existing scholarship. This work ultimately provides a humanistic model for engaging with subjects in politically charged contexts, emphasizing unconditional empathy and care for all as an imperative ethical minimal threshold in sociology and beyond.

https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/cdaafd34-53ca-4d27-920a-a5750b0ec258

https://x.com/SwipeWright/status/1899713972221186189

I am excited for this Clash of the Titans between N. Hariharan, Vivek Sood, Kirti Uppal and Abhijat for the post of the President- thoughts guys? https://www.barandbench.com/columns/power-politics-and-perception-a-clash-of-titans-decoding-the-dhcba-presidential-candidates-elections-2025

the death penalty is a law on the books. there is no popular support for abolishing it in our country. Please find the right to privacy in the constitution. it simply does not exist. I want a right to privacy- but i think that we should get one by constitutional amendment- not judicial activism. what laws endangered the lives of poor people? what papers specifically have argued that all protestors are terrorists? please point me to this stuff.

wont do to just google. What did i ask for- large scale survey. What did you provide? Colin Gonsalves claiming in court that millions were starving and dying of starvation because they had no aadhar. What did he base it on? that lakhs of ration cards were cancelled as they were not linked to aadhar. Unless you assume that those lakhs of ration cards were bonafide and theres been a massive conspiracy to hide millions of deaths from starvation- where did the bodies go? lakhs of people dying of starvation would be really difficult to hide! - his claim is already quite sus. aadhar was put into place to ensure that PDS reaches the appropriate end user, eliminating waste and graft by cancelling ration cards that are not connected to real people is actually helping poor people.

EPW article has no survey at all- only a mention of a handful of people who couldnt obtain their card in 2019 because of illness, old age etc. I got my aadhar in 2021, so yes there were teething troubles in accessing aadhar in the initial years- but theres no reason at all to believe its anything more than that- to believe these are persistent or widespread problems today.

Context article points to two students who claim they were not able to attend government schools because they didnt have access to aadhar. The local government denies this has happened at all. Again- no evidence of any widespread or persistent harm. just so you know- aadhar is not mandatory for enrollment in schools- its literally on the UIDAI website

It is of course wrong that any needy person should face additional impediments to access much needed PDS. thats what PDS is there for. but the fact that there are a handful of cases where some people with extremely difficult circumstances has fallen through the cracks does not mean that aadhar on the whole has caused more harm than good. Policy decisions are all about maximising benefits and minimising harms. I think these handful of unfortunate people should receive all the help they need to create an aadhar. But the fact that they hadnt as of 2019 received that help doesnt mean we shouldnt have some system of checking where public money goes.

Here is an actual survey of 1,67,000 households across india :https://policyinsights.in/research/explore-the-highlights-from-state-of-aadhaar-2019s-pulse-and-in-depth-surveys/

Highlights cause I know you dont read links: 95% of adults have Aadhaar, and on an average use it once a month; 75% of children have Aadhaar;

49% of people used Aadhaar to access one or more services for the very first time (e.g., ration, MGNREGS, social pensions, SIM cards, and/or bank accounts)

80% of beneficiaries feel Aadhaar has made PDS rations, MGNREGS and social pensions more reliable

0.8% of people experienced exclusion due to Aadhaar-related reasons from a key welfare service (PDS, MGNREGS, social pensions) which they had earlier received. (Our survey also found that 3.3% of people experienced exclusion because of non-Aadhaar related problems from a key welfare service which they had earlier received) 1% of MGNREGS job card holders did not get work the last time they tried due to Aadhaar-related reasons (compared to 31% due to non-Aadhaar related reasons)

0.5% of social pension beneficiaries did not receive their pension the last time they expected it due to problems with Aadhaar (compared to 5.7% who did not receive it due to non-Aadhaar related reasons and many more who could not identify a reason)

1.5% of PDS users experienced a biometric authentication failure and did not receive ration in their last attempt. However, 3.2% of PDS users received their rations despite biometric authentication failure.

ID Insight, Dalberg and Omidyar have done annual surveys across different states that provide hard data about the impact of aadhar. Go read them.

Dont believe Dalberg, Omidyar and ID Insight ?

Here is centre for global development surveying 633 households in rural and urban rajasthan https://www.cgdev.org/publication/what-a-new-survey-aadhaar-users-can-tell-us-about-digital-reforms-initial-insights

They found aadhar improved delivery of services, increased financial inclusion of poor people and women.

Is my argument that there are no problems with aadhar? of course not. I know many people who have fake aadhar IDs so its not doing all it can to prevent graft. There are undoubtedly people who slip through cracks and overzealous officials who make aadhar mandatory when it explicitly shouldnt be. but on the whole has aadhar been a good thing? I have large scale surveys from one group of people saying it largely works and saves the government a ton of money. and I have individual case studies on the other hand and theoretical arguments by your Reetika Khera and Jean Dreze and others. I know which one is more generalisable. I also know how hard it is to fake data for a lakh odd people in a survey.

Do we have to be vigilant about whether our aadhar data is secure? yes. Do we need to do more- yes. Is aadhar a massive conspiracy to spy on political dissidents and opponents- hate to break it to you but that was already happening long before aadhar, and introduction of aadhar has not increased surveillance in any measureable way. On the whole- is aadhar a good thing for poor people- very likely yes.

You say you care about poor people- why did you not bother looking it up at all?

There is nothing wrong in arguing for capital punishment. You may think so but thinking does not make it so.

“Protestors” who destroy public property and prevent citizens from exercising their fundamental right to speak and move freely are, in fact, violating law and basic decency. Their punishment is an acknowledgment of that. Nothing wrong in arguing that either.

Elevating the idea of privacy to the status of an indivisible virtue and a strict test of whether a society is democracy or not is hardly reasonable, especially in a country where the poor do not have the luxury to choose between privacy and nutrition or privacy and a good education.

Gonna add to the Poonam Pradhan Saxena hate. I work in an insanely hectic T1 team (about 2 PQE) and at no point has it ever been as bad as a single day at NLUJ under PPS' reign - this should speak volumes. Woman left me, and several others, with deep mental scars. She's petty enough to be read this, but not human enough to feel anything by it.

Vinod Kumar, Daniel Mathew, Srikrishna Deva Rao, Anup Surendranath, Amita Punj are some of them though I am not familiar with all of their work. Since according to a recent thread on this forum, Anup has retired from NLUD, hence he may be excluded from consideration here. At the same time, NLUD has Center for Human Rights and Subaltern Studies and Project 39A is expected to have an office at the university to continue its work. Given the broad nature of academic inquiry that can be conducted under the rubric of human rights, it may also be helpful to consider that there are also other centres with allied interest in human rights, like Centre for Linguistic Justice and Endangered Languages, Centre for Criminology and Victimology,

Centre for Labour Law Research and Advocacy, Centre for Studies in Disability and Law, Centre for Law, Justice and Development, Centre for Constitutional Law, Policy and Governance, Centre for Environment Law, Policy and Research, Centre for Transparency and Accountability in Governance.
========================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================

The aforementioned information is available publicly and I would not presume to consider myself an authority on the kind of work that is presently being done at NLUD on human rights. However, on first glance, the range of work and the multiplicity of convergent centres operating together does appear to indicate, in general, a vibrant intellectual community at the university.

If you do not mind, could you please consider sharing your reasons for it? It would truly be appreciated given how little information is available to outsiders and prospective students when they decide to apply to a particular institution. In general, NLSIU checks all the boxes. Hence, it would be extremely helpful if you could share your perspective in detail. Thanks.

It's not the lack of job that kills your confidence or the mental strength, it's the uncertainty. So kill the uncertainty by thinking you are not getting a job. Only after you build your own certainty, you can then see what lies next. If you are constantly uncertain in thinking - whether or not there will be a job, you will never be able to see what lies next or figure out what to do next.

Why? Are you okay with people in positions of authority engaging in such behaviour? How would you like it if the person on the receiving end of it was yourself or your close family member? What you have written is a totally disgusting response. Please reflect deeply on your life choices.

If you put your focus and concentration on how doomed you will be, then doomed you will be. It's as simple as that. You are applying focus all the time even when you think you are not. For e.g., by simply worrying about 'being doomed', you are actually focusing on 'being doomed'.

So you have to focus on an outcome that is highly positive for you in terms of your abilities and capacities and the compounding you envision for yourself over the course of 5 years.

Focus on that. Cultivate that mindset. Build that habit to consciously focus on having a highly positive outcome. Then things will be better.

When you are thinking of how to not be doomed, you are actually focusing on a state of being doomed, which will lead you there. At the end of 5 years, you might even think, oh well, it was inevitable because of the 3 year gap. DON'T MAKE IT A SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY.

“Everyone wants to be an “ally” these days, although it isn’t clear what this actually involves. Madison has certainly embraced the jargon, always referring to “sex workers” — a phrase designed to pretend it’s a job like any other — rather than prostituted women. Normalising the sale of women’s bodies has been a prime objective of people who make money from it, and it’s been extraordinarily successful.

To its shame, the British Government has even adopted the term, with a 2014 review for the Department of Health claiming that “sex worker” is now “the preferred term used throughout the literature”. …

Male violence is, of course, what prostituted women face every day of their lives. That’s not what the audience at the Oscars wants to hear, cocooned in clothes borrowed from their designer friends and in their chauffeur-driven limousines. Sunday night was an opportunity for celebrities to congratulate themselves on being cool and “sex-positive”, while remaining at a safe distance from the reality of an existence plagued by violence, homelessness and addiction.”

Caveat: Unherd is a centre-right website.
https://unherd.com/newsroom/anoras-mikey-madison-is-wrong-to-sanitise-prostitution/

Apologies for the long post but I hope you will all consider reading this in full. I have provided the details below. My question is, how do such flimsy charges ever pass the muster with the honourable judge? Do they not observe the blatant partisanship with which law enforcement has been weaponised against fundamental rights? In this particular case, the defendants have now been remanded in judicial custody for 14 days! Was the honourable judge correct in how they applied the law? Is their order in conformity with the existing jurisprudence on this subject?

DETAILS: Two journalists, Ms. Revathi Pogadadanda and Ms. Tanvi Yadav were arrested at around 5 a.m. on 12 March 2025 by Hyderabad police on the complaint of a state secretary of the Congress Social Media Cell. According to << https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/hyderabad/two-youtube-journalists-arrested-in-telangana-over-derogatory-video-about-cm-revanth-reddy-9883093 >> “[t]he FIR has been filed under the Information Technology Act section 67 (transmitting obscene material) and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 111, 61(2), 353(2), and 352. The BNS sections deal with publishing or circulating any statement or report containing false information, rumour, or alarming news, and also with intentionally insulting someone to provoke a breach of peace.”

“P Viswaprasad, the Additional Commissioner of Police (Crimes and SIT), said, ‘The alleged video was shot at BRS headquarters in Banjara Hills in February and released on March 10, just ahead of the Budget session, as per an orchestrated plan to insult, defame, and abuse the CM. The content of the video is vulgar, derogatory, insulting, and abusive, crossing all levels of decency. The accused have been doing this repeatedly and posting on social media for fame and views. We have evidence that they have received monetary incentives from the BRS party. We will investigate every aspect.’”

See, I get it i was also close to one of the deceased souls, and maybe this is my way of coping but, we clearly got a message on our batch group from the admin that "The university is having a memorial tomorrow morning at 10 around the acad block. There will be no official mail regarding the same, but whoever is on campus can go to the acad block."

This was just the admin trying to save its face, once the news leaked amongst the local media (which is very hostile to the NLUJ admin) and on LI only then MM and the admin decided to send a mail which we got roughly at 9:34 AM.

The insensitive way the admin handled the situation was appalling, and this has happened earlier as well, the way they had handled the alleged murder of Vikrant Nagaich, may he rest in peace.

But alas, our messages on this platform won't do much other than aggravate the pain. Let's bury the hatchet.

May their Souls Rest in Peace.

1. Random subject allocation.

2. Overburdening with administrative work

3. Students and administration all blaming faculty

4. Hardly any vacations and if you have, there is work from home

5. Pressure of publications in Scopus with no real time to research

6. Parents calling faculty to discuss why their adult child isnt performing well.

to name a few.....