We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I'd be more interested in the Indian context.
On the other hand, you will find virtually no difference a MIT and IIT grad, in fact sometimes the later grads take precedence. Merit matters. So only tech workers, likha bhi toh h.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/andrew-fran%C3%A7ois-25aba1195_law-firm-vs-football-club-activity-7275879813532286976-TXJe?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
Apparently the evidence collected/presented by the former SJA Prez was so strong that despite the best efforts of NKC and his allies, the EC had to unanimously agree the distance education courses were illegally conducted by NUJS and the inquiry needs to be done properly.
What really is the SJA doing? There was a time when dogged pursuit by SJA opened a can of worms involving financial chicanery of UGC funds running into crores and got the Cal HC to direct an inquiry by Justice (Retd) PN Sinha. Soon thereafter an unrelenting SJA despite change in leadership exposed other scams including distance education courses perpetrated by PIB and his Boys.
PIB got booted. Justice Talukdar and NKC killed off all the inquiries. Maybe the problem isn't the SJA but all of us who make up the GB. If the (s)elected few in the SJA prefer servility what about the silent majority or vocal minority?
https://www.barandbench.com/news/calcutta-high-court-upholds-dismissal-sexual-harassment-complaint-against-nujs-vc
P.S. I am yet to see as evidence a single tweet or FB post threatening a certain lawyerβs juniors with rape, as was alleged before the SC in the RG Kar case.
But how is this over thinking / thinking of a job switch is required the best strategy? If you like your work and team - give them a chance. Else - you can switch as everyone else suggests this to be first option!
Also, what impact might it have if the Salaried Partner (SP) knows you personally and is impressed?
Most importantly, what impact is it likely to have if the salaried partner (SP) knows you personally?