We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
--------------------
Master Balachandar Krishnan vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 September, 2020
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
### Bench: B.V.Nagarathna, Ravi V Hosmani
β111. As a sequitur, it is inferred that the respondent/Law School is not akin to a State University established by the State Government. In fact, on a reading of the scheme of the Act, it is clear that the State Legislature was mindful of the fact that it was establishing a national-level institution in the State of Karnataka and that its powers under the Act was minimal. It is also not on par with the other national law schools in the country. It may be that the respondent/Law School is a part of the Consortium along with other National Law Schools for the purpose of participating in CLAT. But, the respondent/Law School cannot be compared with other Law Schools nor is on par, for the reason that the incorporation and establishment of the respondent/Law School is unique; it is the product of an experiment made by the BCI to set up a model law college in India for the promotion of the legal education, which would be a national-level institution. -: 159 :- Hence, the respondent/Law School is a unique national- level institution and cannot be construed to be a State University. It may be that the establishment of the respondent/Law School is by a legislation just as other law schools have been set up in various States of the country but, the similarity ends there. In all other respects, the respondent/Law University is a stand-alone Law School and University of India. It has its own distinctive features and therefore, must function as such so as to achieve the objects for which it has been set up.β
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/170946768/
Remember that Sudhir and alumni argued before the Karnataka HC that other NLUs are not national, only NLSIU is national. Remember that NLSIU students declined to join efforts by students of other NLUs to jointly campaign for NLU nationalisation.
Karma is a bitch.
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/bangalore/nlsiu-agrees-to-reserve-10-additional-seats-for-karnataka-students-9654995/?ref=latestnews_hp
KH grew up in a poor black neighbourhood. Trump was rich from birth.
Orry the nepo rich brat who gets paid for being a poser voted for Trump. Indian elite people like him all go abroad to study and grab foreign citizenship before returning home. They are not in the NLUs. They are not the common people but they are also not the people in charge of the country.
Also, when you say "highly ranked", I am sorry, but if it is a student law journal, unless you published in the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Journal or the McGill Law Journal, that is quite a loaded claim to make. People would be much more willing to take your claim at face value and operate on a "trust but verify" principle if you'd published in a proper journal like Public Law, Current Legal Problems, Law Quarterly Review, Indian Law Review, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Cambridge Law Journal, Industrial Law journal or some similar academic journal with a high quality peer review process.
worst team, never collaborative, too much blame game.
And ofcourse good celebrations
How is the culture generally when I'll be the only male most probably among women, is it good or bad
anyway, my recommendation is use jhana.ai. i've tried Casemine, jurisphere, etc and have claude pro account - but these all have hallucinations when I ask questions with precedent needed
P.s. wouldβve asked my senior here, but they recently explained and I still have the doubt, so response would be v helpful, thanks
i have been searching for a good one for a week nowβ¦if someone has leads near Def Colony or Kalaish Please drop
Is it worth it for someone inclined in Investment Law and Competition Law?
Thanksss
https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/australia-proposes-ban-social-media-those-under-16-2024-11-06/
In fact, the only demographic where Kamala significantly outperformed Trump was Gen Z. But Gen Z just a fraction of the population.
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x98gina
You can have a look at his accomplishments from time stamp 50:48 in this video.
I want to know certain things 1. Is it worth interning at MZM in your Final year? 2. How much they Pay to A0 3. Work culture?
thank you
Most attractive university buildings in India were actually those built by the British, such as IISC and Roorkee.