We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Sam mumbai has one SA and two A0s.
All these activities of painting and games night, where was this? Took so much of time to understand what the hollow place lacks? VC seems to be the most stupid of all. Some Profs are really making efforts.
Aabad Ponda
Sanjog Parab
Please grow up and start accepting criticism, Don't become puppet of Admin.
My only concern here is, people without knowing the gravity of things, what prevailes in college in past and present are here to comment like they are the most aware person about the current scenario. We have the police, we have the law to look after if there's anything wrong. Giving opinion is always welcomed but please for once don't be a hate monger. PeaceποΈ
1. Nice people
2. Slow paced city - after a fucked up life in a fast paced law firm environment- this city will feel refreshing. Not much traffic as well.
3. Decent night life - it is slowly developing.
4. Cheap - including real estate, you can buy a house at a reasonable price
5. Historical city....great architecture
6. Decent weather - hot and cold - you can experience both extremes
7. Great food.
8. Connected to a lot for places you can visit. Rajasthan has enough places you can go for a short trip. Nearby states also provide a good option - MP, Gujarat, Himachal, uttarakhand, etc.
9. Infra is not that great but it is getting better.
There may be some cons as well but I'm sure pros will outweigh the cons.
I suffered from major anxiety and panic disorders in that vertical.
This is accurate AF. Full sarkaari daftar vibes.
I am extremely sorry to hear about your experience .! incase you have the option of dropping in a resignation please do so
If the document is non enforceable you can quit the law firm asap
But incase you are a independent woman you can find alternatives in legal field incase you have good academics you can teach class XI AND XII kids it wonβt pay you much but can help you manage daily finances
Stay strong keep going and prayers for you and I hope you work with good souls who teach you and your mental health remains sane
What according to you are the undisputed Tier 1 firms in the market today?
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/vardhman-cmd-sp-oswal-a-call-digital-arrest-7-crore-transferred-how-vardhman-boss-was-duped-6691527#pfrom=home-ndtv_topscroll
" In last few years, NALSAR has made NLS wipe the floors with their tongue "
2. If anything, comments on voting patterns tend to speak those truths that other people may find (ideologically) inconvenient or offensive, even if they are repeated. Please think carefully about whether you want Legally India to be a forum which has a reputation of populist pandering. Or does Legally India have an ideology too?
3. You know as well as everyone who uses this platform with any regularity that comments that violate one or other of the stipulations in the "Don't publish" section are regularly published (it is true that some are later retracted or redacted, but there are those that aren't).
If you wish for continued traction, I think you just have to admit that your operating model has resulted in this becoming a forum where certain people say things (or say things in a particular way) that they wouldn't if the anonymity measures weren't as strong as they are, and that certain childish fights are played out on here. In fact, why not? That, for all you know, is a niche need that hasn't been served by other equivalent forums. This anyway de facto became a forum for that once you stopped publishing news stories. So why not make it official? Of course, you should maintain the guidelines about not defaming people, not commenting about protected characteristics and the like, but I think a certain level of ad hominem is just unavoidable.
India, meanwhile, is royally f-ed because we are totally reliant on foreign oil. And so are all of us. Nirmala screwed us with more income tax, now prices will rise and our equity investments will tank once the stock markets crash. π
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/opinion/sunday/the-best-decade-ever-the-1990s-obviously.html
Ironically, it was also a decade when papers like NYT and WaPo produced good journalism and not biased propaganda.
As a side note, as for the Calcutta High Court, I got to know that the Juniors over there would charge about Rs. 500 today per appearance, and when a few of them would ask for Rs. 850 (50 GMs - In Calcutta, fees are charged by Gold Mohurs where 1GM=17Rs)), the AOR would say "your senior would charge 10GMs (Rs. 170). So, the Junior Counsels, of say 1-2 years into practice, would earn about Rs. 500 per appearance, and say nothing (depending on their Senior) from their Chamber Senior. For someone with 3-4 or maybe 5 years of practice, I've heard they charge Rs. 2000-5000 per appearance. As for the AOR mentioning that the Seniors would charge Rs. 170 (10GMs) - that would be true, but 20 years ago when the Seniors were raw junior, which, accounting for inflation, would be Rs. 350-450ish today (I'd still argue that Rs. 170 then is worth more than Rs. 500 is today). I've also heard that since the Solicitors would primarily dominate the Original Side of the Cal HC, the Counsels would be dependent on them for briefs, and most of the Solicitors would not pay such Counsels. I am not sure if this is true or not, but I hope somebody sheds some light on this. [Mind you, this is mostly for the Original Side, not the Appellate - I have very little idea on how that would work, since I am assuming that the Advocate would be briefed directly by the Client there]
Enough on Cal HC, for Bombay HC, I've noticed that they have the same system as that of the Cal HC, with the Original Side being considered more glamorous, and the Counsels dependent on Solicitors for briefs. I would really love to know how much the Junior Advocates would be paid per appearance in Bombay, and if they are paid by their Chamber Seniors as well. Ditto on Drafting and Conference Fees.
take one day at a time, keep in touch with your batchmates working at other places, ask discreetly for openings there
you would be valued more with 1 yr PQE
And do read and understand the concept of any law, like family law which you have read in the first semester...
If you want to do better in your studies then try to read Jurisprudence book. That will help you understand the lagal things in better ways.
You can also check sessions hosted by Indian debsocs. They will be easier to understand as you have familiarity with the style of speaking.
Some of those are Glc Deb lit soc YouTube channel
English debating society sbsc
One of the first videos that got me interested was super shiny principled arguments by Ashish Kumar
Very fun video
For rules, search wudc bp manual
WhatsApp link for freshers group- not as active as old ones but theyβre sadly full
Bump
You can also try Samsung Smart monitors 27 inch 4K depending on your budget.
I need some advice. I'm interning at a T-3 firm and today on my 1st day I was assigned nothing substantial except for bitchwork like finding guidelines on something or circulars. Now, I have done my fair share of this in my previous internships, but this was interspersed with substantial research prompt giving and legal research which was stimulating and interesting to work on. But this experience has left a bad taste. Are all law firms like this? I'm concerned that if I do nothing in this internship I will end up not getting a better internship for the next cycle. I need help, I am also thinking that maybe it is the practice area that I chosen which is at fault. Please advice on the next steps I should take.
She is addicted to giving rejections without even reviewing the application.
It's like getting an automatic rejection mail just after you send your application.
Can I please get some examples of questions I can be asked at a technology law firm for the position of senior associate?
Thanks!