We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I no longer edit Wikipedia because it’s become a cesspool of corruption, self-promotion and shameful political bias on the left. Factual statements with citations from even reputed sites are either removed in or hidden deep inside the article so that you will miss it. Let me quote from an article on this, which quotes Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger and Professor Bryan Caplin, who has a PhD from Princeton University.
"The days of Wikipedia's robust commitment to neutrality are long gone," co-founder Larry Sanger said.
"Wikipedia's ideological and religious bias is real and troubling, particularly in a resource that continues to be treated by many as an unbiased reference work," he added.
Wikipedia pages related to socialism and communism contain stark examples.
The two main pages for "Socialism" and "Communism" span a massive 28,000 words, and yet they contain no discussion of the genocides committed by socialist and communist regimes, in which tens of millions of people were murdered and starved.
"The omission of large-scale mass murder, slave labor, and man-made famines is negligent and deeply misleading," economics professor Bryan Caplan, who has studied the history of communism, told Fox News.
The pages include plenty of history, Caplan noted, and are not confined to just philosophical claims. But the history focuses on flattering claims.
Wikipedia’s Socialism page announces: "The Soviet era saw some of the most significant technological achievements of the 20th century."
It ignores a man-made famine in which Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin commandeered the food from regions like Ukraine and Kazakhstan, leaving millions to starve to death even as the Soviet Union exported grain to foreign countries.
The Wikipedia socialism page also mentions China’s Communist history, but only begins its description in 1976, after Mao Zedong’s reign of terror had already killed tens of millions.
"After Mao Zedong's death in 1976... China's economic performance pulled an estimated 150 million peasants out of poverty," the encyclopedia says.
The article fails to mention Mao’s prior communist programs such as his "Great Leap Forward", in which private farming was abolished, leading to mass famine that killed tens of millions.
It also neglects to mention Mao’s "Cultural Revolution", in which, according to the History Channel, "Millions of young radicals who formed the paramilitary Red Guards shut down schools, destroyed religious and cultural relics and killed intellectuals and party elites believed to be anti-revolutionaries."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wikipedia-bias-socialism-pages-whitewashed.amp
Entire reason people use legallyindia is that they can anonymously attack others
Increments are delayed this year too. A word of caution to juniors, join this firm only if you've no way better to go. There's no growth here. The mentality is to make profits on juniors' labor.
also note, applying to vidhi corp team.
tia :)
Usually I do the research online and then try to find similar things in the books just to show him. This feels like complete waste of time and effort. I end up feeling guilty for billing clients for this stupidity.
We are a developing country and need faster growth to catch up to anyone. We are as poor as Africa.
As india grows, there will be more demand for CS, CAs, Corporate Lawyers etc.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/consultancy-/-audit/as-ma-scene-hots-up-india-inc-strengthens-in-house-legal-teams/articleshow/113072744.cms?from=mdr
However, one key difference is that the Jindal girl was from an affluent background who was generally very depressed, whereas the NLUD girl was an IDIA student from a humble background, so her depression may have been worsened by economic and cultural challenges.
At the end of the day, it’s hard to pinpoint one particular cause and we instead need counselling in college by proper therapists. Gen Z is a lot more vulnerable than previous generations and this has been made worse by social media. ▮▮▮
https://www.news18.com/amp/education-career/nlu-delhi-third-year-law-student-dies-by-suicide-police-allege-academic-pressure-9040106.html
I wish to enquire that how can I start improving my research skills. Seniors are either busy in their own work or just don't want to help much.
A senior told me that I can do my first internship in a T-3/4/5 law firm that will give me work or in High Court at a senior that will give me work.
Will the seniors at legallyindia, please guide how valid is the advice of my seniors (as till now, everyone told me to do my first internship at district court)?
Also, if the advice they gave me is correct, how can I follow it?
Do I need connections? (I am a first generation lawyer with no connections in the law fraternity)
(1) HSB Partners is not functioning now, but when it was, it paid between 35k and 200k. Other firms (local) pay comparable salaries.
(2) "Hostile to outsiders" is a generalization, which is incorrect, as most generalizations are.
(3) "No diversity" : Again incorrect. What diversity are you expecting ? If you are looking for gender and caste based diversity, Chennai is fantastic. If you are looking for linguistic diversity, perhaps not. But the same is true of Delhi.
Look like you had a bad experience.
BTW - they have more people leaving soon..
Looking to join M&A team as a SA 1. Please shed some light.
MAT AA YARR KAHI OR DEKH LE
Looks like Cammies are still paid what they were being paid two years ago across positions. We have enough info about SAM. Can people please update about CAM?
Currently, I am stuck in my career, and I stumbled across some certifications, as sitting idle is eating me up. I want to ask if the certificate courses from ▮▮▮ and ▮▮▮ help, as they are costing upwards of 10k some going beyond 100k. Do they anyhow standout in my CV considering I apply to tier 1 or 2 law firms? The certifications are of M&A and IBC.
Please help a brother out...
Increments are delayed this year too. A word of caution to juniors, join this firm only if you've no way better to go. There's no growth here. The mentality is to make profits on juniors' labor.
And then, you never hear from them again.
For context, this happened after they had already confirmed my internship, and I was only trying to confirm the dates and address. I anyway showed up on the first day of the month of my internship at the location I found on Google and no one questioned me why I was there so it ended fine, I ruefully guess.
1. Will I get a job in T1 or T2(I don't have any back support and 1st gen)
2. Will I get any internship or job in any specific field other than dispute( I have intrest and worked in B&D, regulatory, caps mark)
3. Will I be eligible to give judiciary.
Till now I have presentable with sound internship and publication
Any courses or credentials i need to develop to get a job in tier -1 or 2 law firms in India.
What do they look for while hiring and do they hire laterally?
I should think these varied options can account for most of the 34.