We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Can someone please suggest any other way?
In the end, I do think it was a team effort involving many senior and junior counsels, plus NGOs. No one person should claim credit.
To begin with, discrimination against certain communities doesn't just happen because of their lack of money or decent jobs, it happens in any case. There are multiple cases of people in decent position from sc/st communities also getting discriminated against. The concept of reservation is to give them opportunities that were denied to the for years so that there is representation at the top. But that's not the case even now, there is no department where there is any significant representation from the Sc Sc community.
Sc has hardly 3 judges, there are less than 3 professors in IIMs, there is less than 5% representation in media houses, etc.
The seats reserved for sc st already go vacant, if there's a concept of creamy layer, a lot more seats will remain vacant and the process of uplifting will just become slow.
Also, in general, from what my friends who have interned in comp teams have told me, comp law really does not require much preparation at all and anyone can truly wing it. So dw much:)
Shardul - Amarchand - Mangaldas and Cyril - Amarchand - Mangaldas.
You will see how many associates at these type of firms are married to each other. If a girl and guy associate are both single, they will be paired together and made to work on common projects, in the hope that they will fall in love. After all, you will be spending 15-18 hours a day with each other and you won’t have time to socialise with anyone else!
NDA might be the only firm where this even possible i think
And, how do you prepare? Any tips?
I am sure you and I are no one to comment on it.
But would they represent the right or the far right as their clients? If they keep their 'personal ideologies' out of the equation when they are representing clients would MG, say for example, represent a client wanting to criminalise homosexuality.
*Again please do not get me wrong. I have friends, family members (inner circles) who are gay. I am not questioning 'being gay' but how does it play out when personal and public is all, as Bauman would say, 'liquid'.
I really want to understand what enables the left or the centrist to align with issues that if the 'right' had committed these (as in if this was a BJP run state or a sanghi would have done this) to realign their 'personal' ideologies.
I have, in-person, witnessed this happening in a top NLU (although I do not think that the students are either left or contrist) with the exit of a favoured VC. All allegations seemed to have taken a secondary consideration.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/jessica-was-killed-by-a-tall-sikh/story-0N5fir8MoO6Hb79z358CGK_amp.html
Bottomline: When you represent a client you leave your conscience at the door. And please don’t judge people their media and PR persona.
Stop wasting your time bullying the juniors and think about your own future.
Baad me 20 L per hearing fees aapka
In the "University" category of the NIRF, 'placement' is not even an evaluation criterion.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/services/education/iims-shifting-their-focus-from-placements-to-enhancing-students-employability/articleshow/112662279.cms
Also how's the firm for career growth