RTI’d minutes of BCI reveal how multi-crore bar exam contract was awarded to mystery 5th bidder ITeS Horizon #longread

ITES Horizon: ca 2012
ITES Horizon: ca 2012
The BCI’s 2012 meeting minutes regarding the All India Bar Exam (AIBE) have revealed details of the process by which the contract to conduct the fourth and subsequent AIBEs was awarded to ITeS Horizon.

ITES Noida office 2012
ITES Noida office 2012

The Bar Council of India’s (BCI) 2012 meeting minutes regarding the All India Bar Exam (AIBE) obtained by Legally India under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, have revealed details of the tender process by which the contract to conduct the fourth and subsequent AIBEs was awarded to NCR-based software outsourcing company ITeS Horizon Pvt Ltd.

Click here to read full BCI minutes (38 pages) on the AIBE here now.

In 2013 Legally India and Mint published an investigation and detailed feature about the BCI’s difficulties in conducting the first three AIBEs and the then-upcoming fourth one.

At the time, Legally India was unable to reach ITeS for comment on any of the contact details listed on its website or elsewhere, and could not find any office at ITeS’ listed addresses, with its Noida address apparently having been recently abandoned as of December 2012 (pictured above).

Since then, ITeS has carried out the previous four AIBEs and will hold the eighth on 24 May. Some of the issues since then have included:

This is a story explaining, through the BCI’s own minutes, how that multi-crore contract was awarded to ITeS.

The BCI's June 2012 tender notice
The BCI's June 2012 tender notice

BCI calls for assistance

Around 25 June 2012, the BCI called for tenders from agencies to conduct the next AIBE [link to cached copy of call for tender]. Applications were to be received by the BCI on 30 June 2012 with a demand draft of Rs 2,000.

According to minutes of a BCI meeting dated 28 July and 30 July 2012, four contractors had appeared and bid for the job: Aspiring Minds, Rainmaker, Pearson Vue and Manupatra Information Solutions.

However, one printed line at the bottom of the 30 July minutes, slightly out of alignment with the rest of the text, stated that “subsequently ITeS Horizon Pvt Ltd was represented by Ms Rubab Khan”. ITeS chief executive officer (CEO) Khan’s signature and the 30 July 2012 date appears on the minutes:

Minutes dated 30 July 2012 Comprehensive minutes (click to enlarge)
Minutes dated 30 July 2012 Comprehensive minutes (click to enlarge)
”)

On 1 August 2012 Legally India had reported an authoritative BCI source saying that only four companies had applied for the tender. However, on 7 September 2012 BCI chairman Manan Kumar Mishra had told Legally India that those four companies had been rejected and the contract was awarded to ITeS instead as the BCI had decided to carry out a larger share of work internally.

A more comprehensive set of minutes prepared after 30 July 2012 includes the initial bids of all five bidders, including ITeS, as well as the revised bid rates that were submitted by the vendors between 30 July and 2 August 2012.

Comprehensive minutes prepared after 30 July 2012 (click to enlarge)
Comprehensive minutes prepared after 30 July 2012 (click to enlarge)
“)

Historical price points

Rainmaker had conducted the first three AIBEs in 2011 and 2012 under then-BCI chairman Gopal Subramanium, from which the company had generated Rs 4.8 crore in revenue at a rate of Rs 900 per candidate, having created and provided printed study materials.

In 2010 Rainmaker had been awarded the contract without a formal tender held by the BCI according to one RTI response, while another RTI response by the BCI in 2011 contradicted this and stated that Tata Consultancy Services, Sify and Imaging Solutions had been approached for proposals.

The first three AIBEs suffered from delays and several legal challenges in the courts, but were eventually held on March 2011, July 2011, and January 2012.

Under the arrangement with Rainmaker, the BCI received just over Rs 2 crore, or 30 per cent of total revenues.

In the new July 2012 tender, the cheapest revised bids came from Rainmaker, Pearson Vue, followed by ITeS.

Manupatra quoted the lowest amount for repeat candidates for whom no materials would have to be prepared.

Revised 30 July 2012 bids (click to enlarge)
Revised 30 July 2012 bids (click to enlarge)
“)

Rainmaker bid

In the 2012 tender according to the second set of minutes, on 2 August 2012 Rainmaker offered to conduct the AIBE for Rs 500 for any candidate if no hardcopy preparatory materials were required to be sent out. Its initial bid of 30 July pitched with rates of Rs 900 for first time test takers for whom printed materials were required, and Rs 500 for repeat candidates who had failed a previous exam (and would therefore not require additional preparation materials).

Rainmaker said in the tender according to the minutes that it had an annual turnover of Rs 4 crore and would conduct the exam by 15 October 2012.

Full disclosure: Rainmaker is an advertiser on Legally India.

Pearson Vue bid

Pearson Vue is a company that runs the LSAT-India law school admissions test and other competitive exams globally and in India, claiming a Rs 55,000 crore global revenue according to the minutes recording its bid.

Pearson offered to conduct the 2012 bar exam without study materials at a cost of Rs 545 per candidate in 2012, increasing the fee to Rs 595 per candidate by 2013, and Rs 645 per candidate by 2014.

With study materials, the company had initially quoted Rs 670 per candidate. It had said it would conduct the exam within three months.

Full disclosure: Pearson Vue has been an advertiser on Legally India.

Aspiring Minds bid

Aspiring Minds – a company that generates “over 22 crores in the field of assessment” according to its bid, had quoted Rs 675 for fresh candidates and Rs 500 for repeaters in its initial bid and does not appear to have submitted a subsequent bid.

It is not clear from the minutes whether Aspiring Minds also submitted a quote with study materials.

Manupatra bid

For first-time candidates, legal judgment database and publisher Manupatra quoted Rs 850 for the first exam, Rs 800 for the second exam and Rs 700 for the third exam, including study materials.

For repeat candidates it quoted Rs 400 for repeat candidates without materials. Manupatra said it had a total turnover of Rs 22 crores including its publishing arm Universal Legal.

ITeS bid

According to the minutes, ITeS had initially on 30 July 2012 quoted Rs 675 for new candidates and Rs 500 for repeat candidates using the old model test papers as preparatory materials, or Rs 695 per candidate if it had to provide printed study materials.

That quote was revised by ITeS, with the minutes adding that its director Khan “personally appeared and expressed her willingness to conduct the exam, saying that she can run her office in the premises of Bar Council of India itself; it would be Bar Council of India which shall spread its name, ITES shall only be managing the exam in transparent and fair manner.”

ITeS revised rates were:

  • Rs 600 per candidate for a fresh candidate and Rs 500 per candidate for a repeating candidate, without the provision of study material.
  • With study material it quoted Rs 650 per candidate.

According to the minutes, ITeS said that it:

  • had previously “conducted exam of the Global Open University”,
  • had an annual turnover of “Around Rs 5.4 crores”, and
  • could conduct the coming AIBE “within 2 months from the date of signing of MOU”.

And the winner is…

According to the BCI’s 26 August 2012 minutes (page 14 of the bundle of minutes), the members had interviewed representatives from the five bidders, and “after taking into consideration the interest of the candidates, the fairness and impartiality of the exam, the Committee has come to the conclusion that M/s ITES Horizon Pvt Ltd is the most suitable agency”.

According to the minutes, ITeS won the contract because:

representatives of M/s Aspiring Minds, M/s Pearson Vue and M/s Manupatra Information Solutions Pvt Ltd. flatly refused to give a place to a representative/staff of Bar Council of India for proper coordination and answer the queries of the candidates which has been a big problem for the Council during the last two years. They declined to have their offices in the premised of Bar Council of India even for the purpose of liaisoning

and

M/s ITES Horizon Pvt Ltd has agreed to set-up its one small liaisoning office in the premises of Bar Council of India for the purpose of proper coordination with the candidates and its employees. Moreover the rate quoted by it appears to be reasonable and practical. The proper liaisoning between Bar Council of India and the agency was felt necessary during the last two years.

BCI chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, who was also chairman in 2012 during the tender, was authorized to draft and finalise the memorandum of understanding with ITES so that “the next exam could be conducted at the earliest possible time” and for Mishra to supervise the performance” of ITES after every exam and “then to take proper decision in the matter”.

The resolution fixed the date for the next AIBE at 25 November 2012.

Mishra did not respond to an email, of Friday 15 May 2015, seeking comment on whether that condition to the contract had been communicated to all bidders ahead of the tender.

The 26 August minutes record the BCI’s apparent displeasure that Rainmaker had reduced its rates:

It is surprising how this agency [Rainmaker] which was charging Rs 900/- [in the first three AIBEs] has gone down to Rs 650/- suddenly, while the Hon’ble Members asked about this, the representative kept mum.

The Council had terminated the contract with M/s Rainmaker on 18th May, 2012 itself and it was decided not to renew the contract and to invite open tender.

The minutes also noted that the Rs 2,000 demand drafts deposited by Rainmaker, Manupatra, Aspiring Minds and Pearson Vue had been accepted, with ITeS having submitted an “account payee cheque”.

ITeS CEO Khan did not respond to an email seeking comment yesterday on why the company was selected, despite not having been the lowest bidder or having had the most experience. Emails to what used to be its official email address, , bounced and no response was received via the ‘contact us’ form on its website.

Scarce time

Those meeting minutes recorded that the BCI would generally charge new candidates Rs 2,000, of which Rs 550 would be allocated to state bar councils, Rs 650 to ITeS Horizon, and Rs 800 to the BCI. The BCI and the bar councils would spend these proceeds “for welfare of lawyers”.

But the BCI also resolved that due to the already delayed process, no study materials would need to be supplied for the upcoming 4th AIBE and first-time candidates’ fees would therefore be reduced to Rs 1,900.

ITeS would publish five model question banks on the BCI website, but from the 5th AIBE, ITeS “shall supply the study material to those candidates who are desirous for that”.

Agreement reached

On 31 August 2012 Mishra and ITeS Horizon CEO Khan entered into a “binding memorandum of understanding (MOU)” to conduct the AIBE, which would expire on 30 November 2014 and which was disclosed under the RTI.

Study materials

The binding MOU entered into stated that:

ITES Horizon shall be responsible for all technical aspects of the Qualifying Examination, including the next Examinations, which shall include creation of testing content, printing and collection of examination papers, registration of candidates desirous of appearing in the examinations, creation and despatch of materials to aid exam candidates in preparing for the Qualifying Examination (“Preparatory Materials”), complete logistics and infrastructure requirements (including invigilation, confidentiality and support services) for the Qualifying Examination [emphasis added]

In line with the 26 August 2012 resolution due to the delayed process, no study materials would have to be supplied by ITeS for the upcoming 4th AIBE set for 25 November 2012.

The BCI only officially communicated to candidates via its website on 2 December 2012, exactly one week before the exam date, that no study materials would be issued for the 4th AIBE.

Other than a syllabus, no preparatory materials have been created or made available to candidates by ITeS in any of the subsequent AIBEs held since the signing of the MOU.

In March 2015, the Central Information Commission ordered the BCI to proactively post all past AIBE papers on its website after a complaint by a lawyer.

Frequency

The MOU stated:

ITES Horizon undertakes to conduct the Qualifying Examination at least bi-annually (proposed to be held in April and November of each calendar year) from January 1, 2012 onwards to November 2014.

In this regard, ITES Horizon undertakes that the Preparatory Material for each of the examinations would be despatched at least four (4) calendar weeks prior to the date of the relevant examination from AIBE 5.

… ITES Horizon also undertakes to hold exam on-line thirce in a year from the year 2013.

The fourth AIBE was eventually held by ITeS and the BCI on 9 December 2012 – more than three months after the signing of the MOU (having been postponed once from 25 November) and 11 months since the previous exam.

AIBE VI was postponed by a month to January 2014; AIBE VII was postponed twice in 2014; 2015’s AIBE VIII was postponed by two months to 24 May.

In 2013 only a single AIBE was held in August.

In 2014, two exams were held in January and September.

2015’s eighth AIBE will be held on 21 May.

Contrary to the undertaking in the MOU, no online exams have ever been held.

Costs

The fees payable by candidates in the first three AIBEs conducted by Rainmaker were Rs 1,300, including printed preparation materials.

For the fourth and fifth exam under ITeS, the fees increased by around 50 per cent to Rs 1,900 per candidate.

At AIBE 6 in 2014, those costs were hiked to Rs 2,500 for first-time test takers, despite no printed or other materials being supplied to candidates.

When?Months since previous AIBECandidatesFees / first-time candidate (Rs)Max contractor revenues (approx Rs)
AIBE 1 (Rainmaker)Mar 201119,8021,3001.78 cr
AIBE 2 (RM)July 2011412,1581,3001.09 cr
AIBE 3 (RM)Jan 2012524,8441,3002.24 cr
AIBE 4 (ITeS)Dec 20121135,281*1,9002.12 cr
AIBE 5 (ITeS)Aug 2013823,350*1,9001.40 cr
AIBE 6 (ITeS)Jan 20145Unknown2,500Unknown
AIBE 7 (ITeS)Sep 20148Unknown2,500Unknown
AIBE 8 (ITeS)May 20157Unknown2,500Unknown

*Source: RTI filed by Kush Kalra

ITeS AIBE test prep plans

Clause (g) of the MOU stated that ITeS would have the exclusive licence from the BCI to start a chargeable AIBE test preparation course (page 27):

ITES Horizon shall have the exclusive right to publish official test preparatory question papers and model answers for the Qualifying Examination (“Test Prep Series”), both electronically and in print, which shall include the right to create any electronic interface, software programmes, and hardware-linked solutions for the same.

ITES Horizon shall, in writing, enter into a mutually agreed upon revenue share with the BCI prior to the release of the Test Prep Series. BCI agrees and permits ITES Horizon to use the phrase “Accredited and Approved by the Bar Council of India”, or variants of the same, along with the logo and name of the BCI and ITES Horizon on Test Pres. (sic) Series.

A later clause states that “the copyright in the Test Prep series shall belong exclusively with ITES Horizon”.

ITeS and the BCI never started a test preparation series.

Full disclosure: Legally India has an interest in independent bar exam preparation service http://www.barhacker.in

BCI Website redesign

The MOU stated:

ITES Horizon is also willing to undertake the responsibility for the design, creation and content management of the website of the BCI (www.barcouncilofindia.org , the “Website”) and hereby undertakes to launch the revamped website of the BCI in November, 2012, or such other date as agreed upon with the BCI.

The website would be “including an internship format whereby young lawyers can apply for internships electronically to the BCI”.

The BCI website has not been updated since Rainmaker re-launched the barcouncilofindia.org website in June 2010.

Termination

The MOU ended on 30 November 2014 but would be automatically “renewed for additional two year periods on such terms and conditions to be agreed to by the AIBE Committee and ITES Horizon. After every exam, the Chairman shall assess the performance of ITES Horizon and may take necessary action/advice”.

Full disclosure: Pearson Vue and Rainmaker have been or are currently regular advertisers on Legally India.

Legally India has an interest in independent bar exam preparation service http://www.barhacker.in

Bar Council of India (BCI) full minutes on the All India Bar Exam in 2012

Comments

Mr. X 19 May 2015, 07:49
+5 -1
Well done!
Guest 19 May 2015, 09:17
+13 -1
Gossip stories get 20 comments in the first hour. Real stories like this one get 2. Mills and boons sells more than animal farm.
Apalled 19 May 2015, 10:51
+7 -0
This is the industry we work in - Hypocrisy, double standards reign supreme. I would like to see a Law Firm take this up and file a case in court!

Kian, do you think any firm in India has the courage to do so at the risk of alienating the bar?
Friend 19 May 2015, 12:51
+3 -0
This is the state of our country... the case here is open and shut, I hop the activist SC and their CJI catch the culprits by the scruff and haul them over burning coals... else non-legal people will says everything is "black" and the altar of judiciary will keep getting further tarred, and the judiciary will have a very weak defense when executive will want to put the shackles of NJAC on the judiciary.
ABC 19 May 2015, 13:12
+1 -4
I have a feeling that someone will bribe LI and it will forget this story after a few days. I suspect LI has done this before with financial scams at law schools. For example how come LI has stopped reporting on the financial scam involving the registrar at one the NLUs accused of buying goods at inflated costs and receiving kickbacks?
kianganz 19 May 2015, 13:26
+12 -2
Had indeed kinda forgotten that story (but if we had received a bribe on that NLU story, I probably would have remembered it better :).

Has there been any development on that story? If no one does anything about that NLU story, we can't keep digging for ages by ourselves. If you're upset about it, file some RTIs or something - we can't do everything ourselves!
AG 19 May 2015, 17:15
+1 -1
Meant to like your post but accidently touched the dislike option on my phone:(
V 19 May 2015, 13:49
+6 -0
That is very harsh and totally unwarranted, ABC. If you had made such an unsubstantiated and irresponsible statement without the cloak of anonymity that this forum gives you, you would have been in big legal trouble. These guys have just done a great piece of investigative reporting. If you can't find it in you to appreciate them for a job well done, you should at least desist from making such ridiculous allegations like this, which only makes you look like an ass!
FYI 19 May 2015, 17:15
+1 -0
Kian [i]ji[/i] is a brilliant journalist, kudos for the wonderful reporting. I am sure you will be considered for Pulitzer.
Dj 20 May 2015, 04:43
+2 -0
"Kian ji" Kian you have finally arrived
XYZ 19 May 2015, 17:52
+3 -0
How come ITES Horizon deposited "Account Payee Cheque" while as per the tender notification the agencies were required the submit full details and Draft of 2000/- in favor of the Secretary, Bar Council of India? There is something fishy in this. Great Job LI!!
Remshi 19 May 2015, 17:55
+1 -0
Hi Kian,

Can you please tell us something more about this "mysterious" ITES Horizon Private Limited?
Gere 19 May 2015, 18:10
+0 -0
Hi Kian

Kindly confirm, the date of the above said notification was 22nd June, 2012

As it goes on the following link -

http://www.legallyindia.com/Graduates-Bar-Exam/all-india-bar-exam-aibe-unlikely-before-october-4-agencies-in-running

"The BCI had called for tenders from third-party “expert agencies” on 22 June, to assist it in conducting the exam. However, it is understood that no detailed bids have been received to date but only general expressions of interest, listing the credentials and expertise of the applicants."
kuchtohgadbadhai 20 May 2015, 05:09
+0 -0
First on little search I got its Robab Khan not Rubab khan.
Second, you must investigate how Rainmaker got AIBE contract.

Everything is fishy here
XYZ 20 May 2015, 06:46
+0 -0
Mr. kuchtogadbadhai

First of all you have done no little search. You are completely aware of everything. You are very well aware of the name Robab Khan as you can make the difference between Rubab Khan and Robab Khan. Secondly you are very well aware of the fact how the contract of AIBE was awarded to Rainmaker. Overall, your 'little search' is not actually 'little'.
Random 20 May 2015, 10:57
+0 -0
Sidetracking a bit Mr. XYZ?

Fact still remains that it is questionable how Rainmaker was awarded the AIBE contract. Also, there is a lot of muck we all know about - unfortunately we need someone to make the effort. Rainmaker was 'supposedly' funded to the tune of 10+ Crores. Then for a positive vibe around it, it used to claim in 2011-12 that it is on its way to match its burn and run rates. The AIBE earned them 4cr. Then when they bid again their turnover is 4cr? What is the earning then from its other activities that were supposedly profiting - even given that it may be half that - really?

Its terrific to spend money in marketing - makes people believe what you want them to. No money in countering RM - so all they say becomes true.
Guest 20 May 2015, 13:22
+4 -0
I am just shocked and deeply saddened by how little traction this story is getting. These guys must have put a lot on stake to take up this fight. Not like an Internet comment is any help, but for what it's worth, well done legally india.
Anonymous 21 May 2015, 08:42
+0 -0
Minor correction- The 2015 exam will be held on 24 May and not 21 May.
Random 21 May 2015, 08:49
+2 -0
Can any firm in the country raise their hand and help bankroll a case against the BCI? All this is telling us is that there 'may' be a chance for justice, unless you go up against a lawyer. I never understood marital privilege - husband kills a man in front of the wife, and the wife can't be forced to testify. Rubbish. Same way - the bar does what it does and not a lawyer ready to raise their hand?
peabrain 21 May 2015, 08:53
+0 -0
Kian, it might be useful, if possible, to also find the source of the concept of the AIBE. If I am not wrong, Rainmaker conceptualised the AIBE and presented it to GoSub who ran with it thereafter, and rainmaker's contract provided them with a guaranteed period for which they could run the AIBE. Lets not forget the huge costs which Rainmaker is likely to have incurred to set up test centres, prepare the test material (which I have seen and they're positively superb) and so on and so forth. For the company to be kicked out of a concept it created and put into action seem equally unfair. Of course, no one knows if rainmaker has gone to court over the termination of their contract and if so, why not?
RM 21 May 2015, 10:21
+1 -0
Either you are a friend of RM or you are completely oblivious to RM. I would say you are a friend of RM or RM itself.

You can't get upset on losing an illegal cash cow obtained illegally and cry wolf, being a wolf yourself.
XYZ 21 May 2015, 11:54
+0 -0
Ha Ha Ha.. good resembling!
qwe 21 May 2015, 10:10
+3 -0
Taking & proposing AIBE is a serious mistake committed by Indian Lawyers, whatever was their purpose it didn't take place. Nobody is taking a check whether the lawyers/advocate who didn't succeed were restrain from practicing or appearing before court of law. I think & as i know everybody was practicing even advocates who didn't appear. Also the method of questioning is too poor.
They just want all to succeed.
BCI as well as 3rd party agencies whoever was conducting the exam has just created their source of revenue, expenses of their meetings & eating of snacks.
Instead of that BCI should had asked Central Govt to conduct that exam or proposed law to make UPSC who take just Rs 100/- to take exam & BCI are charging & earning money from students who had not just started their career yet.
All students are not about to appear on Supreme Court or High Court so what is the need to make such exam.
About contract, they can award contract to anybody in using term "in the public interest". They know nobody about to ask them, supreme court will take their side & Govt. are reluctant to involve in this controversy
Is there is need to investigate previous as well as current BCI President???
kianganz 21 May 2015, 11:36
+0 -0
Latest news, we've received an email from the BCI, with 147 journalists and others copied in.

No attachment though. We've asked for them to send with attachment.

Anyone want to guess what it's about?

[img]http://snag.gy/NHDU5.jpg[/img]
Remshi 21 May 2015, 12:05
+0 -0
Hi Kian,

I am not able to see what it is. Can you please share a big picture of it?
kianganz 21 May 2015, 12:15
+1 -0
Publishing full attachment shortly. It's a six page letter, will be interesting...
Remshi 21 May 2015, 12:22
+0 -0
Thanks!
gengauri11 21 May 2015, 21:10
+0 -0
Guys plese help me out by filling this survey

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/T8PH2GN
Guest 22 May 2015, 00:43
+2 -2
I am glad that LI's tabloid days are potentially in danger.
The fact is that sadly Kian is no more a 'journalist' than Mumbai Mirror is a 'journal'. All LI does is to publish half baked rumours and gossip and thrives on people mud slinging on the comments section. Ive noticed Kian panders to the shroffs and few others and is super careful to publish anything 'defamatory' about them but gleefully watches comments defaming the smaller people like Manisha Shroff, etc. Pretty much Kian you've become the lapdog of the big firms. Of late all LI does is to copy B&B's scoops and Kian doesnt even have the honesty to admit as much. Anyways kudos to BCI (for once) and I hope somebody puts a stop into this trash publication that pretends to be a source of 'news'. I can think of quite a few areas of law LI will be in breach of and these will be forwarded to BCI soon. Lets see how long that stupid smirk remains on your face Kian.
Bogus 22 May 2015, 07:27
+0 -0
Seems, you are an agent of Manan Kumar Mishra. You are free to go any extent. Ultimately, the judiciary will come to know all about Mr. Manan & Co.
Guest 23 May 2015, 07:06
+0 -0
Lets hypothetically assume, that Legally India has motivations to publish this story. Even so, they've backed the story with facts and evidence. Which is a lot more than the basis of award of contract to ITES ! Are you suggesting that they should not have come out with the story at all, even when they discovered the evidence? That's just bull my friend. Mud slinging bla bla. You're the one slinging mud, cause you're the one making these rubbish statements without an iota of proof. Tell us why do you think the story doesn't stand good, because as of now it appears that LI has researched this well and backed this up with evidence.

Go LI Go, woot woot.