The Bar Council of India (BCI) noticed the “gradually detracting” (sic) “standard of dresses by the students of law all over the country” and recommended all law colleges to devise their own dress codes “befitting the profession”, but “it would be preferable” if a dress codes of white shirt with white, black or grey trousers was followed.
The BCI sent the note to all Indian law colleges last Thursday, 7 April 2016, although it had originally passed the resolution attached to the letter on 18 October 2015.
On Wednesday, 6 April, Legally India had first reported the controversy at NLSIU Bangalore over a professor chastising a student for wearing shorts to a lecture, with most mainstream media beginning to carry the news the day the BCI’s letter was dated.
The BCI’s Legal Education Committee (LEC), in its 18 October meeting, acted on a written request from the Madhya Pradesh bar council’s chairman Rajesh Pandey to prescribe a uniform dress code in all law colleges.
In its 7 April notice, which it sent to all law schools (see full letter below), the BCI stated:
it has come to the notice of the Council that all institutes teaching law, it has been found that the standard of dresses by the students of law all over the country is gradually detracting and which does not give impression of proper dress code discipline specially for the professional education.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the matter is left to each university/college to decide in respect of dress code what is feasible befitting the profession in this regard.
It would be preferable, if the college follow dress code white shirt with trouser (white/black/grey).
The BCI notice is dated a day after an NLSIU Bangalore class wore shorts to class, en masse, to stand up to NLSIU professor Dr V Nagaraj for his allegedly inappropriate remarks on Monday to a female student of the class, who had stepped into his lecture wearing shorts.
After mainstream media followed the story aggressively most of last week, Nagaraj and the students yesterday “amicably” resolved their differences, according to a press release from NLSIU’s vice-chancellor yesterday; however, Nagaraj told Legally India today that he had never apologised or expressed his regret to students over the issue.
We have reached out to BCI chairman Manan Kumar Mishra via email seeking comment on why the notice was sent to the law schools now, almost six months after the recommendation was resolved in the LEC meeting, and a day after the NLSIU shorts story broke.
Comments
No infrastructure, no worries
Abysmal education standards, no BCI intervention
Shorts in class, BCI acts faster than a cheetah.
It's ridiculous that in a country where 1/3 of the lawyers are fake, where about the same proportion cannot even pass an abysmally easy and terribly organized AIBE, this is the "problem" the BCI springs to action to "solve"
But seriously, bad jokes aside... this is crazy
Promoters : Ram Muthalik, Praveen Togadia, Shiv Sena, Sadhvi Prachi. Rest they would steal from law students on the pretext of conducting a shady bar exam!!
In fact, if i am not mistaken the AMSS (at least the older version if not now) dresscode mandated that "Females with facial hair are required to shave to look presentable. You should always shave legs (if wearing skirts) and exposed armpits." That is ridiculous!
Well, thats probably cause the way they see it, you represent them and their firm when you meet clients... and if they feel their clients are more likely to associate clean shaven lawyers with professional ones, they are certainly going to ask you to shave...
Formal clothes perhaps once in a week should be fine!!
Pewds: you did exactly the same hat you accuse Change with the times for! see you are types I wanna request to put some clothes on so that you brain works tad bit right and not focus on getting bjobs all the time!
It's a pain you get used to after a while
On a more practical note, considering where the hostels are located and the quality of infrastructure available, its just not possible for students in residential law schools to turn up in a crisp white shirt and trousers every day.
This is just not called for and is none of their business. In fact I more firmly now believe that we should have a more professional regulator for legal education (NOT BCI) as they dont seem to get it and make a mess of everything (example Bar Exam).
A PIL contesting these directions should be filed. In my view this violates freedom of speech and expression, and freedom of life.
The AIBE-9 results were supposed to be released "tentatively before 15 Th April 2016". Don't you think its time we had some fun about this?
A well wisher