AOR giant Agarwal Law temporarily cuts fee-earner salaries after COVID ‘crippled the work’, with ‘no visibility’ on return of normal

Lockdown and measures to keep court safe have hit litigation specialist practices hard
Lockdown and measures to keep court safe have hit litigation specialist practices hard

Top advocate-on-record (AOR) and Supreme Court powerhouse Agarwal Law Associates (ALA), which has around 50 lawyers, has announced a cut in fee-earner salaries of 30% on those earning more than Rs 40,000 per month at least until 14 April, after closure of the courts and social distancing measures have caused court work to fall off a cliff.

In 2018, ALA had been the busiest law firm in terms of making AOR filings before the Supreme Court, according to our data.

As such, it is no surprise that the firm would be especially hard-hit by the closure and it is unlikely to be the only litigation firm feeling the pinch.

According to an internal WhatsApp message (see below) circulated by management amongst fee-earners, the there was “no clear visibility on when the lockout will end and when the courts will resume functioning normally”.

The immediate cut in compensation was “harsh”, admitted the message, but hopefully “temporary”.

ALA has five partners, with mammoth AOR filer EC Agrawala and Mahesh Agarwal leading the firm, alongside Rishi Agrawala, Chitra Agarwal and Shally Bhasin.

Then there are two associate partners and 44 other fee-earners, according to its website.

One of the partners commented, on condition of anonymity that the firm could lift the temporary pay cut after 14 April, when the government-announced shut down would end.

We understand that all ALA fee-earners are currently working from home but since the firm primarily does litigation work, and the Delhi courts having begun effectively shutting their doors to most hearings since 13 March, there is currently very little billing.

We have reached out to the firm for comment.

Double whammy

Full-service corporate transactional firms have so far been aggressively bullish in keeping fee-earners in the money - with some even paying record bonuses early.

However, it is increasingly likely that their businesses too will not be immune for long during the coming economic downturn, which is all but certain to hit the world.

Full-service transactional firms normally have a hedge during recessions, which can mean an uptick in restructuring and disputes work that can pick up at least some of the slack in lower transactional billings as creditors seek to claw back funds or parties try to get out of contracts and obligations.

However, the current situation is somewhat atypical for law firms (as for the world, no doubt), in that disputes have been hit even before transactional work.

Despite working-from-home and corona-related uncertainties, transactional work still has the advantage for now of being able to continue under its own momentum, as well as benefiting from clients seeking advice on how to deal with a changed world and regulations.

However, with the shut-down of the courts and tribunals, at least for now, the legal industry’s one-two-punch of a recession has clearly already started, much earlier than in prior financial crises.

ALA hopes for quick return to form

Agarwal Law Associates, meanwhile, vowed in its message to fee-earners to be “first off the block when normal court activity begins”.

It is a safe bet that disputes will not disappear overnight, though this also requires courts adapt to this potential age of social distancing, perhaps with technological innovations, instead of it disrupting more this year’s court calendar.

ALA noted in its WhatsApp message:

“Dear All

The world has changed in an unprecedented manner in the last few weeks. There’s practically no one in the planet who has not been impacted by Covid 19.

At Agarwal Law Associates, we are fortunate that all of us and all our loved ones are safe and healthy. We hope and pray that this continues to be so.

Unfortunately, the business environment is not very favourable for us. The closure of all the courts and tribunals after first week of march of this month has crippled the work. There is no clear visibility on when the lockout will end and when the courts will resume functioning normally.

In light of these developments , we are compelled to take some harsh, but hopefully, temporary measures. With immediate effect, we are compelled to reduce compensation of all by 30 per cent(except for those under 40000)

We hope to restore to full levels as soon as the wider environment permits. As you are all aware, we are one of busiest and most productive law firms. We will therefore be the first off the block when normal court activity begins.

We have all grown together in good times. Hopefully, this phase shall pass soon.

Thanks ?”

Comments

Curiously Wow 28 Mar 2020, 06:29
+36 -1
ALA must be working on highly competitive, and wafer thin margins, to adopt such a punitive approach this soon! Someone please tell, do they, otherwise, follow a ‘eat what you can kill’ policy, when determining comp?
Agarwal Sweets 28 Mar 2020, 06:36
+49 -0
Not such a giant after all.
216 28 Mar 2020, 08:03
+57 -0
Cheap. Very Cheap.
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 08:36
+5 -16
This is just the beginning. All firms will slash pay and also freeze recruitments. Final year students expecting a salary can only hope to join LPOs.
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 08:40
+30 -0
"we are compelled to reduce compensation of all" .... except the boss.
Client. 28 Mar 2020, 09:48
+53 -3
Disgusting behaviour. Apalled. We will move. We do not work with insensitive people. If they can't take care of their own during this crisis, how will they take care of us.
No words 28 Mar 2020, 15:17
+17 -1
Really hoping clients do so. In times when it mostly seems like people need to take care of each other because of an inadequacy of action, all this must be remembered and considered even if it doesn't directly affect the servicing of matters.
Asst. GC 28 Mar 2020, 17:36
+30 -3
We have decided to move our litigation away from them. Mail to the team went out today. No more briefs going to them. Other reputed firms can get seniors just as easily now and are charging competitively.
bhai sahab 28 Mar 2020, 10:53
+34 -0
This is really very cheap. Law is a profession which thrives in chaos. Litigation is only going to increase in view of COVID 19 situation. Mr. A knows much better. Such is very preemptive measure. What kind of leading firm is this that cannot bear employee costs for a quarter. [b]Looks like an excuse!![/b]
Arbaaaz 28 Mar 2020, 13:01
+12 -1
Decision taken too early .. Agrawal is well to do firm and it should have stood up with people in this time
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 14:48
+15 -4
Such a reputed law firm, I am sure it has fairly deep pockets to cross over this tide. Dont tell me that it doesn't even have cash reserve to pay full salaries of lawyers for a month. This is all hogwash and very cheap and immoral - particularly when the government has appealed to all employers not to deduct salaries during this time.
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 15:34
+7 -38
The government's plea not to cut salaries is for people in the unorganized sector who may not have enough salaries to create reserves to tide over times like these. It is not meant to be an overall directive vis-a-vis the lawyers working on fat-ish salaries. You were required to save up for such times. Further, aren't lawyers among the professions with the highest levels of tax-evasion in the country? You guys, esp. those practicing in courts, show your earnings far below the actuals and eat away at the nation's ability to build up its coffers.

I know you'll get together on closed clubs like these and vote comments such as these down. So click away.
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 17:29
+12 -12
It's an open secret that law firm associates get to pay tax straight forward only on 50% of their salaries, as presumptive income. It was originally meant to help those who have independent practice and hence have expenditure to take care of. But blatantly misused by law firm associates, who actually get salaries, but are not required to show it as such, but do so as revenue instead.
Anything goes 29 Mar 2020, 06:37
+14 -7
So, what's the point again? That's the case with all law firms, not just ALA right? Are you advocating that all other firms also go for pay cut because retainers take advantage of the 50% presumption rule? Do you think the Firms really care how the retainers pay taxes?

If you have a problem with that, and want stricter enforcement or change in law, go lobby the govt/MPs. Stop trying to hog the limelight here. The point here is the premature (if not unjust) step on part of ALA.
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 06:51
+10 -3
If associates abusing tax provisions like that isn't unjust, then the law firm's move to cut costs isn't either. If associates don't want to stay at the firm on those terms, they are free to leave. Plenty of others who would be happy to join. If on the other hand, associates abusing tax provisions is unjust, then one unjust act begets another. In either case, one shouldn't cry for free market and capitalism and then run back to government or regulatory intervention when the going gets tough.
Anything goes 29 Mar 2020, 07:25
+20 -4
Khuch bhi? Clearly there's been no pay cut for ALA PR team.
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 09:02
+9 -5
I've absolutely no relationship with this firm whatsoever. Nor do I consider their action to be a wise one. However, the sheep calling the kettle black seems amusing. There's nothing unjust about a private entity reducing salaries at any point of time on any pretext unless it goes against the contracts that it has. It's distasteful, and in this case, even needless maybe, but that's how capitalism works. When associates take unjust advantages of their relationship by calling their salaries revenues for tax purposes, then they should be ready to face the downside of it too.
Anything goes 29 Mar 2020, 12:22
+30 -4
Please read up a bit. Lawyers at firms have no option but to call it revenue and not salary. Bar Council rules prohibit lawyers from taking up employment, hence 'retainers' at law firms, hence revenue and not salary. After that, a retainer can decide not to abuse the law and pay actual taxes rather than taking advantage of the 50% presumption. However, your logic continues to amaze me.

You seem to be an in-house counsel (if not ALA PR) who has given up his bar registration and has to pay full taxes on his 'salary'. I feel your pain and I commend the honest path chosen by you. But please do not litter this post with unrelated comments, if this is not a case of sour grapes.
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 14:32
+11 -4
What you said didn't explain why law firm associates actually still take the presumptive route while knowing that it is certainly unethical to make such claim. And you should get tired by now of getting things wrong. My bar registration is perfectly intact, I am not an in-house lawyer and I do not evade taxes either, not even in the garb of 'tax planning'. The point remains, calling this firm's actions as 'unjust' is laughable. Nothing unjust about it, distasteful and premature yes. People who have joined the firm as associates, while taking advantage of the presumptive route, should also be ready to take it in their stride if the firm chooses to 'retain' them for a lower amount. If they are unhappy, they can leave. Can't have it both ways.
JamaalGota 30 Mar 2020, 21:53
+1 -0
check out NDAs firm structure and lodge a complain with the bar council
Anything goes 29 Mar 2020, 12:27
+5 -3
Also, buddy while you are taking up on the much required reading during this down time, it usually is the 'pot' calling the kettle black and not the 'sheep'. Sheep are generally white. You're welcome.
Mary, Mary 29 Mar 2020, 14:33
+6 -2
@Anything goes: There are always plenty of black sheep around. Several of LI commentators belong to that category.
AdityaB 29 Mar 2020, 09:23
+9 -6
Wtf are you smoking??? But seriously couldn’t understand the link or relevance between the Associates tax planning (or in your words ‘evading’) and the law firms arbitrarily deducting retainer fees. ALA nowhere has said that they are deducting the retainer fees because the Associates are taking advantage of the presumptive tax loophole. Dude from where are you deducing this convulated theory??? Would really love to understand this
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 12:27
+7 -2
There is no linkage. Just that neither act is 'unjust'. As an associate, I'm fully entitled to take advantage of every loophole in the tax law of the land. As a law firm partner, I am also fully entitled to decide to reduce the salary of all the associates if I happen to sneeze one time too many in the day. If said associates are angry by that, they know where the door is. If my clients want to take their business elsewhere because of such tasteless actions on my part, they too can do so. It's not as if the associates are covered under the Minimum Wages Act and I'm violating its provisions.
8.1.1 29 Mar 2020, 12:50
+1 -2
comment 8.1.1 is correct. But why blame the lawyers for that. Thats the way our tax structure is!
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 14:35
+11 -4
Why blame the law firm for cutting costs in difficult times (even if prematurely)? That's the way capitalism is.
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 14:57
+17 -1
This is where capitalism gets exposed in all its ugliness. The partners of the firm can just tell the associates to either accept the reduced salary, or take a hike, so to speak. Plenty of young associates willing to step into their shoes. No use begging the firm to listen to the government now, free market in all its unrestricted freedom is rarely a humane creature.
No words 28 Mar 2020, 15:15
+10 -0
Firms have never been the most healthy place to work at but for the ones who are willing to give it their all and put up with some class acts because it's a work place and not a party of friends, it's been an acceptable trade off.

Lawyers must be discerning and call a spade a spade. Most MPs have minted enough money over time to be able to not screw over their fee earners.

Regardless of whatever is said, people will remember the employers that stood by them - even if not for altruistic reasons, the lawyers will be still thankful for the bonuses that came in. And people will remember the likes of Agrawal - a "powerhouse" trying to act like a piddly little powerless firm.
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 17:31
+15 -3
This is why we need foreign law firms. Indian firms have a bania mentality.
Foreigner 30 Mar 2020, 07:39
+11 -2
Foreign law firms (American ones especially) will be the first to start the firing process. What world do you live in? Hint: Remember 2008?
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 17:32
+13 -6
Two minutes silence for LI commenters who mocked UPSC merit rankers and said govt jobs are worthless.
Guest 28 Mar 2020, 18:49
+29 -3
A lot of them are. Considering how the people currently holding those positions are making a mess of the current situation.
Hari Om 29 Mar 2020, 06:50
+6 -15
Oh really? Would Your Lordship guide the world as to how to tackle this? Something of which nobody in the world seems to have clue of, not even WHO!

Sitting in cozy cubicles of law firms don't make your wiser! Government is doing the best it can possibly do so, with the available resources. The government is being guided by 100s of eminent experts in their respective fields.

It's amazing to see your skyrocketing cockiness. What's your claim to fame? A law firm job? Stop your bunkum of blaming business - and worry about your bills. That's the best you can do, right now.
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 09:04
+22 -4
Yes, keep thinking that the government has the interest of the masses at heart and it is doing everything possible to optimally use the resources that it does have. If that makes you sleep better at night, nothing like it. Ground reality says otherwise. Sorry I cannot share your blind faith in the state machinery in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Easy 28 Mar 2020, 19:16
+7 -14
True. Some LI commentators are not really aware of any life beyond the cubicles of those law firms. Even I wasn't, when I was in a Big 6 law firm a few years back.

Having pursued an MBA and working with a top global PE fund, we - the PE managers - do think that corp law firm lawyers are very over-rated. Been there myself, so know that very well. Fill in the blobs - and work over.
hearsay 29 Mar 2020, 04:20
+40 -1
Former Big Law PE fund manager should be the absolute last person to comment on being overrated.
Rose-gulla 29 Mar 2020, 07:10
+52 -2
Fund manager calling Corp lawyer over-hyped. Irony committed suicide by jumping from Indiabulls towers.
Yeah 29 Mar 2020, 12:44
+0 -5
Because you world ends with the last cubicle of a law firm. Sad.
IndiaDulls 29 Mar 2020, 07:41
+11 -2
I know the quarantine hasn't been very conducive for mental health, but I did not think I would live to see the day a PE manager calls someone else out for filling in blobs. Very on brand though, because that's the mindset that develops if your only interaction with a law firm has been on doing PE DDs ignoring the rest of the practice areas.
PE Manager 29 Mar 2020, 12:46
+1 -8
That’s what you do. Filling in the blobs in agreements. And who dictates the commercials? We. :)
IndiaDulls 29 Mar 2020, 16:19
+19 -1
Tum LI comments section mein kahan commercials dictate karne aa gaye ho, not over your Big Law hangover yet? Did you write your comments yourself or are you waiting for approval from your Principals?
Bas Bhai 31 Mar 2020, 09:25
+0 -0
Its sad that Mr. PE Man here had such a [...] law firm life. [...]
Lp640 28 Mar 2020, 19:27
+5 -1
I doubt anyone would be earning less than 40k per month in a half decent firm! So this shocker of a decision affects all. Hope other firms don’t take notice of this.
Noctis 28 Mar 2020, 19:53
+3 -0
My sympathies to the fee-earners at Agarwal Law. They must be a demolarized lot !

Have Karanjawalla’s announced anything yet? They’re also primarily a litigation firm.
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 04:16
+2 -12
Just wait people: Law firm associates will be working as Zomato delivery boys once the economy tanks. Better to do an MBA, as 11.2 suggested.
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 05:14
+26 -0
So they can manage their delivery routes and workload better?
SCAORA 29 Mar 2020, 05:15
+0 -2
Pl cover AOR 2019 results too!
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 05:45
+12 -0
Nobody cares!
SCAORA 30 Mar 2020, 10:57
+0 -7
Kyon.... Tumhara regulation mein aaya kya? Ya phir do saal ke liye debar ho gaye? Apna personal opinion, public opinion mat batao.
Guest 30 Mar 2020, 11:32
+9 -0
Public opinion is that nobody cares. If you want to see your name on print and get a kick out of it, place an ad.
SCAORA 30 Mar 2020, 13:39
+1 -5
How are you so sure I have appeared for the exam or for that matter I am a litigator? The comment was aimed at getting Kian to cover the results, for his coverage is always different and better from other sites (where news is akin to press briefing). My name anyways gets enough coverage on actual transactions I execute ;-)
Guest 30 Mar 2020, 14:49
+1 -2
I was not sure. Hence the 'if'. Given your comprehending ability or lack thereof, one wonders about the fate of the 'actual transactions' that you execute. Or might butcher be a more apt verb?
SCAORA 30 Mar 2020, 15:43
+1 -3
I'm pretty sure about my drafting abilities, but your 'cute' interpretation exposes your lack of legal knowledge and skills. 'Hammer' would be the apt verb of what you're doing - hammering the table ;-)
Guest 30 Mar 2020, 17:23
+3 -1
The only thing that got exposed here is your inclination to blow your own trumpet in the form of insubstantial hints about your great and noble deeds. I am secure enough in my legal knowledge and skills, which have been tried and tested by people far better than you. Tell you what, since you are this much keen on the results, you should freelance and then give the piece to Kian to publish.
SCAORA 31 Mar 2020, 00:26
+1 -3
Look who is blowing his own trumpet now? Your comments are not only petulant, but also establish your nosy behaviour i.e. commenting without realising the context in which a particular statement was made. You clearly didn't not understand why someone posted a comment, but in order to act oversmart (God knows who you were trying to impress or the substance you had consumed, which got better of you) and made an unwarranted comment. Hope you have the humility to accept that you started this chain by making a completely uncalled for comment.
Lol 30 Mar 2020, 16:04
+7 -0
You can see the isolation getting to people now :p
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 06:00
+1 -0
See that's how the employers are.....itne mein lag gayi. Giant my foot.
John Doe 29 Mar 2020, 06:55
+7 -0
It's indeed disquieting that ALA despite being such a law giant started panting so quickly and failed to even wait to complete this corona virus marathon of 21 days. It is indeed appalling and despicable a step. I am sure that they being such an old firm had ample reserves with them saved during good days that they could have used to tide over these difficult days and mitigate this tough situation but rather chose not to do so. Very unfortunate that they don’t care for their staff.

I am in agreement with Asst. GC. All big corporates should leave them since they have left off their staff in these trying times. When they don’t care for their own people forget that hey will ever take care of anyone’s interest. [...]
Ala 29 Mar 2020, 07:01
+5 -0
Guys,

We had a lot of expenditure this year.

We had to organise my birthday party at a law officer's (not constitutionally sanctioned) house.

Did you see the notsofancyohisitarolexitiwasarolex that we had gifted to [...]?

[...]

Let's not forget all the miscellaneous expenses that we incur every month.

It is funny how non lawyers (corp slaves) are commenting about what this is like.
WTF 29 Mar 2020, 09:07
+7 -2
All mid to large size law firms operate on at least 2-3 months' working capital. Credit lines have not been withdrawn and, in fact, most banks will now impose a moratorium on repayments. Given the above, I do not see any logic (other than greed) in salary cuts being imposed eight now. If situation persists for longer then maybe this can be justified. Also, if rewards are with promoters / equity partners then why shouldn't they bear the risks? Someone has rightly said, all these law firm owners have baniya / lala mentality! #KeepSqueezing
paisa banao bhai! 29 Mar 2020, 10:54
+2 -0
mujhe kitna cut doge ? apni firm se matter tumhari mein shift karwa dunga!
Lit 29 Mar 2020, 12:50
+0 -1
Take a deep breath.

Even though corp segment may not do very well, future is, indeed, bright for lit practice. So- relax.

And yes, the Government is doing the best it can. Compare and analyse.
Louis Litt 29 Mar 2020, 14:34
+14 -0
The future is lit indeed.
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 16:21
+0 -2
A state finance minister in Germany just committed suicide after discovering how bad the German envoy has been hit. Do you think India is going to be a bed of roses?
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 17:01
+22 -0
A bed of lotuses, maybe.
Stop. 29 Mar 2020, 23:02
+4 -0
Don't mean to undermine the tragedy of the suicide or underplay the significance of what is happening to the economy but we need to stop saying stuff like that. The government has a job and our expectation should be nothing less than that, they do it.

Do clients say it's not a bed of roses when they need something done ASAP? There are ample numbers of mental health and drug abuse issues in the legal fraternity also, however, we are required to deliver no matter what. While we obviously everyone would like their job to be easy, sometimes it just isn't. The government needs to act and do its job (had they taken this more seriously from January, we might not be at this stage), and just because the times are tough doesn't mean they get a pass on the what is expected of it.

Start recognising that the State exists for the betterment of people, and they need to do that first and foremost. And if that isn't the attitude the citizenry adopt, but instead one of apologists, we'll never get of this cycle of useless administrations.
Mirchi 30 Mar 2020, 04:27
+0 -0
https://theprint.in/opinion/politically-correct/ias-india-steel-frame-of-resistance-against-coronavirus/390811/
Guest 29 Mar 2020, 23:26
+4 -7
Why has my comment been deleted? I said the fault is not with Mr Agarwal but with Xi Jinping. And then I unloaded on China and commies in India. Are we supposed to shower praise on Xi and China now???
Guest 30 Mar 2020, 04:52
+9 -3
Actually, half the reasons for Indian health, education and other sectors being underdeveloped and completely unprepared to deal with a crisis like this is because of the crony capitalism we practise here, not communism. Even now, your focus on whom to blame instead of how to get out of the current predicament is indicative of your immaturity and reflective of how the mass behaves like sheep. I do not believe that communism can work for reasons of my own, but I am not buying what you are peddling either.
Sign of times? 30 Mar 2020, 09:00
+0 -1
Have never worked with this firm but am not surprised. Every firm will go through this. See what has happened with the big 4 firms.

https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/big-4-firms-defer-promotions-appraisals-bonuses-and-salaries-amid-virus-crisis-11585505169035.html
UPSC 30 Mar 2020, 12:22
+5 -3
Bhailog itna hi expertise dena tha governance ka, you all should have dared to give UPSC and be there on the hot seats to make critical governance decisions. Criticising is always very easy.

Respect what the government is doing.
Civil Disobedience 30 Mar 2020, 12:44
+14 -1
The problem you see is that people like you think that once someone has cracked that exam and assumed those offices, that person no longer has any accountability to the citizens and hence any and every criticism aimed at him must be a sign of disrespecting his office. Only brainwashed people and blind bhakts think like that. Such as a bulk of the German population used to think about Hitler and the Nazis. Government actions do not become respect-worthy and criticism-proof simply because people in power are taking such actions. They need to satisfy other standards for that. If they do not (and in this case, there have been several such actions that do not), then they would be rightly criticized and so would be the people taking such actions, regardless of how far up the bureaucratic ladder they are. Doing so is actually a sign of loving one's country, a fact that you and your ilk would never understand, far less appreciate.
Guest 30 Mar 2020, 14:50
+1 -0
Hear, hear!
UPSC 2 30 Mar 2020, 19:14
+2 -3
Why so frustrated? Let's be appreciative of the efforts being put in - not just by the Central govt, but also the various state govts. Kerala is doing a fine job! Just see the vigour with which the governments across the board have responded.

Our cubicles are cosy. But their jobs aren't. Protecting 1.3 billion people out there, and satisfying some pessimists and naysayers like you, isn't an easy task - but they are on it.
Anti Modi 30 Mar 2020, 19:16
+1 -4
Bas yar, kitni bar German nazi example bataoge tum anti-Modi log. Have read my world history. Tell me some other comparatives now!
Guest 30 Mar 2020, 17:34
+0 -0
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/telangana-announces-big-salary-cuts-amid-coronavirus-outbreak-2203232?pfrom=home-topscroll

Whether it will happen is another debate. Interesting point is that populist politicians and maybe the political class generally is willing to consider such a step. I guess the Greek tragedy may come on us as well.
Realist 31 Mar 2020, 12:49
+3 -2
Despite being lawyers and fee earners, we still haven’t seemed to break out of the mindset of behaving like salaried employees. Legal practice is based on availability of client work and the client’s ability to pay.

Why should an honourable lawyer expect money for work which either doesn’t come (because courts are not operational) or need to be done at a lower cost in difficult times?
Best friend 7 Apr 2020, 10:01
+0 -0
Well, a well know Firm, my best friend works for has postponed the salaries till end of the lock down!!! Why not just transfer the money, as they do???
Jackal 9 Apr 2020, 03:56
+1 -1
The (emotional) arguments of the commentators justifying the salary slash leave a lot to be desired! One can be certain that these people have no clue about the law, economics or even society in general. The presumptive taxation scheme wasn't introduced just for "practicing lawyers", it was introduced for varied classes of professionals, lawyers just happen to be one of them. An associate working at a firm is as much a professional (rather than an employee) as any independently practicing advocate. Her relationship with the firm is that of an independent contractor. The remuneration received is in the nature of a retainer (rather than salary). She doesn't get any social security like an employee would, both statutory or gratuitous. Which means there's no pf, health insurance, gratuity, company paid vacation for the family, company assisted telephone bill payment, etc. etc. An associate is completely on her own. On top of that most people working at law firms (especially the younger brigade) live in rented accommodations owned by unscrupulous individuals who insist on cash payment (thereby ruling out any HRA tax exemption). In this backdrop, the presumptive taxation scheme came as a much needed relief and not as any undue favour!

It's not expected that everyone will be knowledgeable or intelligent, but the least one can do is to be compassionate, at times like these! Unfortunately, it appears that covid-19 has brought out the ancestral traits of the aggarwals!
Guest 9 Apr 2020, 05:44
+2 -1
Sorry, the expenses that you mentioned have to be borne by a lot of salaried individuals too. Your argument does not hold good in the light of that. Not all salaried individuals get all the perks that you mentioned from their employers. Apart from PF. And the corresponding difference is minuscule when compared to the huge savings firm associates make as a part of the presumptive scheme. A normal salaried person earning less than 10 lakhs a year ends up paying more tax than say, an A0 earning 17 in their first year with the firm. The latter can even avail of the other tax reliefs that a salaried individual can get under 80C, home loan interest, mediclaim etc. Of course, there is nothing that prevents an A0 from actually subtracting the expenses that he incurs in course of work and then paying tax on his actual income. But very few people would do it. If you are claiming the retainer that you are receiving from law firms as 'revenue', and paying tax on only half of it, then sure you are not doing anything illegal, since the law of the land allows you to do that, but it sure isn't ethical either. Especially when compared to actual practitioners who need to incur actual expenses for their practice or salaried people, who don't get to avail of similar benefits even after discounting their PF (the only social security that most salaried people in this country get). This has got nothing to do with compassion or Covid or even a salary slash. It's just a fact. If you take advantage of this unique legal fiction that is the relationship between a firm and associate, then you should also stand ready to absorb the fallout of such relationships, which includes at will salary cuts. Even salaried individuals in private companies are being subjected to that and they don't get to avail of benefits like the presumptive scheme either. I would rather reserve my compassion for them. Personally, I like to pay my tax as ethically as possible.
Guest 23 Apr 2020, 13:21
+0 -0
shameful