Which state did best in CLAT 2015? 4 charts prove Karnataka is king of CLAT, while UP, Bihar underperform

Legally India has crunched the numbers in the first merit list into a table that will tell you which states performed best at the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT).

The largest number of applicants came from India’s most populous state, Uttar Pradesh, from where 7981 applied for the exam.

Rajasthan, Madhra Pradesh and Delhi each sent between 3,000 and 4,000 candidates each.

However, several states are over-represented considerably when it comes to the proportion of their population that apply for the CLAT.

In Chandigarh, for every 1 million of population, 270 sat for the CLAT.

In Delhi, 200 out of 1 million inhabitants sat for the CLAT.

After the two city states, Haryana, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab are all around the 50 candidates or more per 1 million mark.

Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh all send less than 50m per capita, which is still above the national average though.

States such as Karnataka and Maharashtra sent fewer candidates per capita than the national average.

CLAT performance per capita

Evaluating only the top 1000 rankers in the CLAT per 1 million of local population, does not paint a drastically different picture, although a few states perform better than their population would suggest here.

Karnataka, for instance, has a disproportionate number of top 1000-ranked CLAT candidates and is above the national average now, despite having sent fewer candidates per capita than many other states.

CLAT performance per state vs total candidates sent: Top 100 ranks

The relative performance of CLAT applicants compared to how many candidates came from each state, paints a different picture than the previous charts.

Karnataka performs better than all others, with 1.2% of its CLAT candidates getting into the top 100.

This is closely followed by Maharashtra, where 0.8% of CLAT candidates made it to the top 100.

The ‘others’ category, which presumably includes non-resident Indians, scored just above Kerala and West Bengal.

Less than 0.4% of candidates from Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Punjab made it into the top 100 ranks.

Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Telangana, Delhi, Uttarakhand and Bihar all perform below the national average.

A number of smaller states, including Chandigarh which supplied the highest number of candidates per capita, did not get any students into the top 100 ranks.

CLAT performance vs total candidates sent: Top 500 ranks

The picture is mostly replicated in the top 500 ranks, though Chandigarh appears in fifth place in the rankings of top-500-ranked candidates as a percentage of total candidates sent to the CLAT by the state.

Karnataka and Maharashtra again perform best in this metric, alongside West Bengal and Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Kerala and Telangana.

Delhi, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh and Odisha again perform below average, getting fewer candidates into the top 500 ranks per CLAT applicant than the national average.

Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Himachal Pradesh perform the worst.

Also read

All data (click table header to sort by each metric)

DomicileTotal taken CLATCandidates ranked in top 100% in top 100 ranks out of all CLATersCandidates ranked in top 500% in top 500 ranks out of all CLATersCandidates ranked in top 1000% in top 1000 ranks out of all CLATersCLAT takers / 1m populationTop 1000 CLATers per 1m population
Karnataka837101.19384.5627.4141.01
Maharashtra129610.77423.2775.912.69
Others1591.6342.5148.8
West Bengal13937.50342.4513.715.56
Chandigarh2860062.1103.52719.48
Madhya Pradesh374511.29742.01443.8521.98
Rajasthan375713.35701.91273.4551.85
Kerala9205.54171.8252.728.75
Telangana6641.15101.5314.719.88
TOTAL / AVERAGE37358100.275001.310002.731.83
Delhi33585.15381.1722.12004.30
Gujarat8022.2591.1162.013.26
Uttar Pradesh798115.19811.01742.240.87
Odisha861008.9172.021.41
Tamil Nadu10814.3710.9211.915.29
Assam239002.831.38.10
Haryana24254.1619.8461.9961.81
Punjab13684.299.7191.449.69
Jharkhand950006.6161.729.49
Andhra Pradesh330002.641.27.08
Uttarakhand7811.134.5131.7771.28
Bihar24323.1211.5351.423.34
Chhattisgarh10132.204.4131.340.51
Himachal Pradesh3001.331.351.744.73
Andaman and Nicobar5000000130
Arunachal Pradesh13000.00090
Dadra and Nagar Haveli5000000150
Daman and Diu200000080
Goa21000.029.5141.37
Jammu and Kashmir153000.021.312.16
Manipur32000.000120
Meghalaya43000.000150
Mizoram15000.000140
Nagaland21000.000110
Puducherry18000.000140
Sikkim15000000250
Tripura37000.000100

Source: Legally India research / CLAT 2015 first merit list / 2011 census data

Comments

Robin 15 Jun 2015, 17:14
+1 -3
Good research Kian! Kudos to you!
Blah 15 Jun 2015, 18:43
+20 -4
Kian you are seriously so jobless to do all this shit stuff. Get a life.
Blah 15 Jun 2015, 18:46
+6 -0
are you online kian? plz reply..
kianganz 15 Jun 2015, 18:47
+20 -2
Lol, why, are you lonely? :)
Blah 15 Jun 2015, 18:47
+5 -2
OMG I am chatting to you.
kianganz 15 Jun 2015, 18:48
+8 -1
Yes you are. Looks like we're both jobless :)
Blah 15 Jun 2015, 18:49
+2 -0
I am from Shimla.have you been here.
kianganz 15 Jun 2015, 18:50
+6 -1
Hi Blah from Shimla. No, not yet, but it's supposed to be a beautiful place.
Blah 15 Jun 2015, 18:51
+4 -0
When I first saw your pic. I thought you are Kashmiri or from Shimla.You are so white. But Bombay is so crowded. i left my course midwy at WWI coz of traffic and congestion.
kianganz 15 Jun 2015, 19:16
+2 -0
Well well, all the best, nice chatting to you! :)
Robin 15 Jun 2015, 21:50
+4 -0
Ha Ha Ha :D
Blah 15 Jun 2015, 19:19
+4 -0
:) Good Night :)
Blah Blah No sleep 15 Jun 2015, 21:59
+10 -0
Thanks Kian for bringing back Orkut!
Guest 15 Jun 2015, 23:51
+4 -0
Kian reaching out to his fans :-)
wtf!!!
Guest 16 Jun 2015, 03:00
+0 -0
well GUJRAT HAS LOT OF STATE QUOTA
THOUGH FEW PEOPLE SAT FOR CLAT
Francis J Underwood 16 Jun 2015, 05:21
+5 -1
Kian, Prachi.. this is an excellent analysis!
kianganz 16 Jun 2015, 05:26
+6 -0
Thanks Francis, I like your show! :)
Gorky Guru 16 Jun 2015, 06:17
+2 -0
nice work fellas!!
Guest 16 Jun 2015, 09:07
+4 -4
So many from Uttar Pradesh. Looks very fishy given that RMNLU was the convenor. Would not be surprised if they leaked it to some UPites in the process
sachi? 19 Jun 2015, 00:04
+0 -0
..almost as if you didn't even read the article.
Hint: UP had the highest number of candidates. go figure.
maharana pratap 16 Jun 2015, 09:13
+1 -0
Taking only a single year's result as the sample does not give any balanced or conclusive results. For all we know sikkim may have done better than all the other states in 2012. Do your homework Kian. Say no to click baiting.
Anon 16 Jun 2015, 14:56
+2 -1
The 'analysis' of this year's results among those under North-East Domicile is as follows:-
[till the first 5 digit rank]
Sikkim 10007
Mizoram 3960 12819
Manipur 8202 8990 12564
Nagaland 5080 5893 9236 9773 10124
Tripura 5346 6552 7904 8500 8711 12199
Meghalaya 6399 6694 9407 10950
Assam 289 299 586 1360 1925 2073 2078 2174 2192 2933 3363 3480 3526 4357 4665 4886 5003 5020 ~~~[too many]
Arunachal Pradesh 10475


As always, among the North East States, Assam has excelled with more than 10 under 10000; save for Assam, the Rank would be with Mizoram with the highest, followed by Nagaland, Tripura, Meghalaya, Manipur, Sikkim and A.P.

While you may be correct in the statement that one year's result as a sample does not give a balanced or conclusive result, this article doesn't claim to be one.

Using the 'For All We Know...' argument would be wrong, since if you claim [assuming you are only talking about the North-East States] that Sikkim would have done better the other states, what is your argument against the stance that the other states, say Manipur or A.P. would've been/done better than Assam or Mizoram or say, Sikkim for that matter?
maharana pratap 16 Jun 2015, 16:45
+2 -0
Relax man. I have no personal preference. My only point is that in the previous years the order could have been very different. Also, while the article does not claim to be conclusive, it does make very general statements.
Anon 16 Jun 2015, 12:15
+0 -1
"..After the two city states..."? Neither Chandigarh nor Delhi is a state. Expect better from 'Legally' India.
kianganz 16 Jun 2015, 12:18
+3 -2
They're both city union territories? Sorry, I never studied for the CLAT, some basic nuances of local general knowledge sometimes escape me...
rockstar 16 Jun 2015, 19:27
+0 -0
This is good stuff Kian! I think your next research should be on the CLAT ranks of those whose chose Symbi, Amity and Jindal. so we can determine how many gave up seats in lower ranked NLUs (Bihar, Ranchi, Assam etc) to study here. This will also call for greater scrutiny into these new NLUs. How good are the infrastructure, placements and faculty at these new NLUs?
Anon 17 Jun 2015, 18:16
+0 -0
Kian, I really appreciate your and Prachi's work. Truly, Legally India is one of a kind and really interesting. Groundbreaking stuff. Thank you for LI and keep up your good work!
kianganz 17 Jun 2015, 18:20
+2 -0
Thank you, glad someone appreciates our data geekery! :)

It's a lot of work crunching the numbers but the outcomes are quite interesting.

Would love to see and cover some deeper academic analysis with these kind of issues also.
Really? 18 Jun 2015, 17:56
+0 -0
Good to see LI getting some nice stuff out rather than just feeding gossip. Well done.
true caller 23 Jun 2015, 13:29
+0 -0
Nice analysis great work