Articles tagged with: gay rights
We're not completely alone: On the (il)legality of oral and anal sex in the USA
At 3pm today, will Thakur, Dave, Khehar do the highly unlikely and creatively reconsider section 377?
Chief Justice of India (CJI) TS Thakur, and justices Anil R Dave and Jagdish Singh Khehar, will hear the section 377 curative petition today at 3pm in the Supreme Court.
AP Shah on s377: Parliament or judges must take up the gauntlet to fix wrong SC decision
SCOI Report: HC's grant of tax exemption to a film on gay sex: SC's hasty grant of leave for Guj gov SLP, raises serious questions
On September 15, the Supreme Court bench of justices Anil Dave and Adarsh Kumar Goel expedited a pending hearing on admission of SLP, and granted leave thus converting it into a civil appeal, even while continuing the ad-interim relief granted earlier. In the normal course, it would not have raised eyebrows. But when it became known that the subject of the SLP is about the Government’s denial of tax exemption to a film on gay sex, Meghdhanushya, (meaning a spectrum or a rainbow) it made news and rightly so. The film centers around a young boy who finds himself attracted by persons of his own sex.
Student sues Chinese gov't over its textbooks calling homosexuality a disorder
'Totally misquoted' on section 377: SCOTUS, social media 'mood' [DID NOT] nudge law minister Gowda to consider making gay sex legal [UPDATE-1]
SCOTUS takes thee, gay marriage, to be legal as SCOI yet to allow gay sex [READ JUDGMENT + Katju-ism]
In a landmark judgement, the US Supreme Court ruled on Friday that gay people can marry nationwide and states cannot ban same-sex marriage - an issue that divides America and India.
Cops arrest gay man under section 377 for cheating on arranged wife
Counter-counterpoint: Why a prez reference of the 377 judgment is still the best option and is neither dangerous nor forum shopping

Section 377 opinion: The spectre of forum shopping and why a presidential reference would be ‘dangerous’
Advocate Alok Prasanna Kumar argues against a presidential reference as a tool to cure Koushal v Naz, as suggested in a previous column by Sudhir Krishnaswamy and Shishir Bail.
Today the Supreme Court has rejected a review of its own Section 377 judgment. A curative petition too will likely end in failure, given the high rate of rejection for review and curative petitions. But while there is much wrong with the Koushal v Naz judgment, we should not give in to the temptation that Section 377 cannot be struck down by a Constitutional Court and must instead be left to Parliament to repeal. For one, there isn’t even a cogent argument to that effect you will find on reading the Supreme Court of India’s judgment in Koushal.
Curative petition Friday after SC rejects 377 review: Justices Dattu, Mukhopadhaya 'see no reason to interfere'
Must read: Justice Leila Seth, mother to gay son, condemns Naz 377 reversal
Section 377, Koushal v Naz: Why reference would be better than review

Opinion: A rare defence of Justice Singhvi in the section 377 'media trial'
Advocate-on-record Amit Gupta puts forward the unfashionable opinion that, although Justice GS Singhvi’s judgment in the section 377 gay sex case was not perfect and unpopular, he did in fact get the law right.
#377 round-up: Global condemnation continues as lawyers prep review petition & lobby, BJP speaks against gay sex & NCRB to gather stats
The SC’s material errors should enable ‘review petition’ of its #377 judgment

Column inches slamming SC’s Naz ruling overwhelm but 2009 academic argues how #377 is constitutional
7 creative (legal) reasons the Supreme Court found not to strike down Section #377

[READ 377 JUDGMENT]: Supreme Court bans gay sex again as ‘constitutionally unsustainable’
